scholarly journals Lumbar disk prolapse: Response to mechanical physiotherapy in the absence of changes in magnetic resonance imaging. Report of 11 cases

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 289-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doris Broetz ◽  
Ulrich Hahn ◽  
Evelin Maschke ◽  
Wolfgang Wick ◽  
Wilhelm Kueker ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 94 (11) ◽  
pp. 1582-1593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Ju Hung ◽  
Tiffany T-F. Shih ◽  
Bang-Bin Chen ◽  
Yaw-Huei Hwang ◽  
Li-Ping Ma ◽  
...  

BackgroundLumbar disk degeneration (LDD) has been related to heavy physical loading. However, the quantification of the exposure has been controversial, and the dose-response relationship with the LDD has not been established.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate the dose-response relationship between lifetime cumulative lifting load and LDD.DesignThis was a cross-sectional study.MethodsEvery participant received assessments with a questionnaire, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine, and estimation of lumbar disk compression load. The MRI assessments included assessment of disk dehydration, annulus tear, disk height narrowing, bulging, protrusion, extrusion, sequestration, degenerative and spondylolytic spondylolisthesis, foramina narrowing, and nerve root compression on each lumbar disk level. The compression load was predicted using a biomechanical software system.ResultsA total of 553 participants were recruited in this study and categorized into tertiles by cumulative lifting load (ie, <4.0 × 105, 4.0 × 105 to 8.9 × 106, and ≥8.9 × 106 Nh). The risk of LDD increased with cumulative lifting load. The best dose-response relationships were found at the L5–S1 disk level, in which high cumulative lifting load was associated with elevated odds ratios of 2.5 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]=1.5, 4.1) for dehydration and 4.1 (95% CI=1.9, 10.1) for disk height narrowing compared with low lifting load. Participants exposed to intermediate lifting load had an increased odds ratio of 2.1 (95% CI=1.3, 3.3) for bulging compared with low lifting load. The tests for trend were significant.LimitationsThere is no “gold standard” assessment tool for measuring the lumbar compression load.ConclusionsThe results suggest a dose-response relationship between cumulative lifting load and LDD.


Spine ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janette M. Vincent ◽  
Jane E. Baldwin ◽  
Clare Sims ◽  
Adrian K. Dixon

1991 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-176
Author(s):  
Shinpei Miyazaki ◽  
Kensei Nagata ◽  
Teruaki Ohashi ◽  
Masashi Sagara ◽  
Kengi Tanaka ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 53 (9) ◽  
pp. 633-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yawara Eguchi ◽  
Seiji Ohtori ◽  
Masaomi Yamashita ◽  
Kazuyo Yamauchi ◽  
Munetaka Suzuki ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 410-413
Author(s):  
Naoyuki Kuga ◽  
Keiichirou Shiba ◽  
Takayoshi Ueta ◽  
Kenzou Shirasawa ◽  
Hideki Ohta ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document