Fatigue impact, gait and balance performance in chronic stroke survivors

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-54
Author(s):  
Adebimpe Olayinka Obembe ◽  
Alaba Ezekiel Olalemi ◽  
Beatrice Oluwayinka Loto
Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shamay S Ng

Introduction: Negotiating obstacles during walking is challenging and demanding for stroke survivors and it is a common cause of falls. As ability to negotiate obstacles is essential for community ambulation and functional independence in stroke survivors, assessing the ability to negotiate obstacles should be a crucial element in stroke rehabilitation. The Timed Up and Go Test with an Obstacle (TUGO), which is the modified from the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, could be used to assess the ability to negotiate obstacles. In TUGO, subjects were required to stand up from a chair, walk forward for 5 meters, step over a 5-cm height obstacle which is placed at the end of 5-meter walkway, turn 180 0 , step over the obstacle again, walk back and sit down on the chair as fast as possible. Time required to complete the task was recorded by a stopwatch. The objectives of this study were to investigate the reliability of TUGO and its correlation with motor functions in people with chronic stroke. Method: This study was a cross-sectional study with 30 people with chronic stroke. TUGO completion times was administered along with Fugl-Meyer motor assessment for the lower extremities (FMA-LE), Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and timed Up and Go test (TUG). FMA-LE, BBS and TUG were used to assess motor control of the affected lower limb, clinical balance performance and functional mobility respectively. The TUGO was conducted in 2 separate sessions with 5-7days apart by 2 independent assessors. Result: TUGO completion times demonstrated excellent intra-rater, inter-rater and test-restest reliabilities, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of 0.955-1.000. Significant correlations were also found between TUGO completion times and FMA-LE scores, BBS scores and TUG times respectively. Conclusion: TUGO is a reliable, valid and easy-to-administer clinical assessment for assessing the ability to negotiate obstacles in people with chronic stroke.


2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (S 4) ◽  
Author(s):  
A.R Luft ◽  
L Forrester ◽  
F Villagra ◽  
R Macko ◽  
D.F Hanley

Author(s):  
Michael Houston ◽  
Xiaoyan Li ◽  
Ping Zhou ◽  
Sheng Lia ◽  
Jinsook Roh ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 383-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Na Jin Seo ◽  
Leah R. Enders ◽  
Binal Motawar ◽  
Marcella L. Kosmopoulos ◽  
Mojtaba Fathi-Firoozabad

2011 ◽  
Vol 105 (5) ◽  
pp. 2132-2149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anindo Roy ◽  
Hermano I. Krebs ◽  
Christopher T. Bever ◽  
Larry W. Forrester ◽  
Richard F. Macko ◽  
...  

Our objective in this study was to assess passive mechanical stiffness in the ankle of chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors and to compare it with those of healthy young and older (age-matched) individuals. Given the importance of the ankle during locomotion, an accurate estimate of passive ankle stiffness would be valuable for locomotor rehabilitation, potentially providing a measure of recovery and a quantitative basis to design treatment protocols. Using a novel ankle robot, we characterized passive ankle stiffness both in sagittal and in frontal planes by applying perturbations to the ankle joint over the entire range of motion with subjects in a relaxed state. We found that passive stiffness of the affected ankle joint was significantly higher in chronic stroke survivors than in healthy adults of a similar cohort, both in the sagittal as well as frontal plane of movement, in three out of four directions tested with indistinguishable stiffness values in plantarflexion direction. Our findings are comparable to the literature, thus indicating its plausibility, and, to our knowledge, report for the first time passive stiffness in the frontal plane for persons with chronic stroke and older healthy adults.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document