Are rehabilitation programmes enabling clients to return to work? Return to work perspectives of individuals with mild to moderate brain injury in South Africa

Work ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mogammad Shaheed Soeker ◽  
Viki Van Rensburg ◽  
Andre Travill
Author(s):  
◽  
Peter Meulenbroek ◽  
Therese M. O'Neil-Pirozzi ◽  
McKay Moore Sohlberg ◽  
Rik Lemoncello ◽  
...  

Purpose: Return to work (RTW) is a major life participation metric used for persons with a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) have clinical expertise in the cognitive-communication aspects of TBI. This clinical focus article aims to support the clinical practice of SLPs by summarizing key interprofessional vocational rehabilitation (VR) models and illustrating the role of the SLP throughout the RTW process with a case study. Method: This clinical focus article was written by the Academy of Neurologic Communication Disorders and Sciences TBI Research Group along with a VR expert. Authors engaged in deliberative, agenda-based discussions beginning with a literature review based on previous systematic studies. Discussions explored relevant VR and SLP practices. Results: This clinical focus article presents key VR models in parallel with SLP assessment and treatment to illustrate best practice patterns in an RTW field with a dearth of SLP-specific literature. We summarize general VR approaches and four evidence-supported VR models for adults with TBI. We highlight how a model of interprofessional assessment can assist with planning and communication of important work-related concerns. We illustrate how the chronological model of work return can assist with developing goals and planning treatment. Conclusions: SLPs play an important role in identifying, managing, and collaborating with an RTW team following TBI. A working knowledge of VR models can assist with improving the dialogue between SLPs and VR professionals and can inform practice when working with persons with TBI who have work return as a goal.


2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 435-444
Author(s):  
Tessa Hart ◽  
Jessica M. Ketchum ◽  
Therese M. O'Neil-Pirozzi ◽  
Thomas A. Novack ◽  
Doug Johnson-Greene ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Paul Wehman ◽  
Pamela Targett ◽  
Charles Dillard ◽  
Priya Chandan

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Kerrin Watter ◽  
Areti Kennedy ◽  
Vanette McLennan ◽  
Jessica Vogler ◽  
Sarah Jeffery ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Following acquired brain injury, the goal of return to work is common. While return to work is supported through different rehabilitation models and services, access to vocational rehabilitation varies within and between countries, and global rates of employment post-injury remain low. The literature identifies outcomes from vocational programs and experiences with return to work, yet little is known about individuals’ perceptions and experiences regarding rehabilitation to support their vocational goals and experiences in attempting to return to work. Method: This qualitative study investigated the experiences of community-living adults with acquired brain injury (n = 8; mean age 45 years; mean time post-injury of 5.5 years) regarding their vocational rehabilitation and return to work. Focus groups and semi-structured interviews were conducted, with data analyzed via thematic analysis. Results: Participants identified negative and positive experiences with vocational rehabilitation and return to work. Five overarching themes were identified: addressing vocational rehabilitation in rehabilitation; facilitators of recovery and return to work; the importance and experience of working again; acquired brain injury and identity; and services, systems and policies. Participants also identified five key areas for early vocational rehabilitation services: education; service provision; employer liaison; workplace supports; and peer mentors. Study findings inform current and future practice and service delivery, at a clinical, service and system level.


2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 1103-1112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela I. Drake ◽  
Nicola Gray ◽  
Susan Yoder ◽  
Michael Pramuka ◽  
Mark Llewellyn

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. E57-E64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lene Odgaard ◽  
Søren Paaske Johnsen ◽  
Asger Roer Pedersen ◽  
Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document