scholarly journals Body Image and Breast Cancer

1970 ◽  
pp. 49-54
Author(s):  
Evelyne Accad

Granted, mutilations against women do not take place solely within the context of this disease, but cancer treatment provides the surgeon with all the necessary alibis. Misogyny is rampant in this field, where there are practically no female cancer specialists of note. How long must we wait before there is a commission of enquiry into female mutilations, and not only the excision of young girls, that poster child of cultural difference, but an enquiry into the whole range of mutilations inflicted upon females, excision in the name of custom, mastectomy in the name of cancer, and on-the-off-chance hysterectomies!Jeanne Hyvrard, Le Cercan (p. 168)

2020 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. S337-S338
Author(s):  
M. Batenburg ◽  
L.E. Van Stam ◽  
R. Gal ◽  
I. Van Dam ◽  
A. Doeksen ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 1002-1003
Author(s):  
Donna Egbeare ◽  
K. Shuttlewood ◽  
P. King ◽  
D. Ferguson

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krista D. Bridgmon ◽  
Patricia A. Levy ◽  
Susan Calhounstuber

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (04) ◽  
pp. 247-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie K. Chu ◽  
Matthew J. Davis ◽  
Amjed Abu-Ghname ◽  
Sebastian J. Winocour ◽  
Albert Losken ◽  
...  

AbstractNipple sparing mastectomy has been popularized in the modern era of breast cancer treatment due to its touted advantages with regard to resultant body image and reconstructive outcome. Implant-based techniques remain the most prevalent means of breast reconstruction. Special considerations regarding patient selection and technique are reviewed for implant reconstruction in the setting of mastectomy with nipple preservation. Applications for prepectoral and direct-to-implant reconstruction are discussed and published outcomes are summarized.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document