Counter-Terrorism Framework and Individual Liberties in Ghana

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-65
Author(s):  
Samuel Boadi Adarkwah
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
Member State ◽  
International Law ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Emerging Democracies ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Counter Terrorism ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
Terrorist Acts

Does the flow of legislation arising from the United Nations Security Council's Resolution 1373 framework create rule-of-law and other issues of liberty for individuals in emerging democracies? This article examines the surveillance and other counter-terrorism laws created by Ghana, a Member State of the United Nations, in response to its international law obligation to combat terrorism. The article finds that significant tension exists between the government's attempt to implement legislation for the detection and suppression of terrorist acts and the rule of law and the enjoyment of individual freedoms and liberties in Ghana.

Stakeholder Theory and Justice Issues: The Leap from Business Management to Contemporary International Law

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-180
Author(s):  
Bronik Matwijkiw ◽  
Anja Matwijkiw
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
International Law ◽  
Stakeholder Theory ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Transitional Justice ◽  
Business Management ◽  
Secretary General ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Post Conflict ◽  
The United Nations

AbstractIn this article, the two authors examine the leap from business management to contemporary international law in the context of stakeholder theory. Because stakeholder theory was developed for business management, they provide a thorough account of the original framework. Furthermore, to illustrate the theory's application as a recently adopted parameter for the United Nations, they use former Secretary-General Kofi Atta Annan's 2004-report to the Security Council, "The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies". Proceeding on the hypothesis that while all premises ultimately match traditional positions in general jurisprudence, it appears that stakeholder theory nevertheless forces the United Nations to take sides in an unprecedented manner, especially pertaining to rights-typology and the credentials-checking for this. Finally, some of the most important implications are distilled as part of an attempt to formulate a few recommendations for United Nations justice managers and administrators.

scholarly journals UN Accountability for Haiti’s Cholera Epidemic

AJIL Unbound ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 17-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ira Kurzban ◽  
Beatrice Lindstrom ◽  
Shannon Jonsson
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
United Nations ◽  
International Law ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Cholera Epidemic ◽  
Legal Obligations ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
Settlement Mechanism

A lawsuit pending in U.S. courts against the United Nations for its responsibility for Haiti’s cholera out-break is the largest challenge yet to the impunity of the organization, which has thus far refused to comply with its legal obligations to provide a settlement mechanism to the victims. With no such avenue of redress available to them, those affected by the epidemic have been left in the bizarre situation where in order to obtain justice they must file lawsuits against the United Nations, whose mandate is to defend the rule of law and promote human rights. If successful, the suit would improve accountability for the organization and underscore the need for it to comply with international law.

The Rule of Law and Human Rights in the Balkans

2000 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 223-256
Author(s):  
L. C. Green
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Viable Alternative ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Balkans ◽  
The United Nations

SummaryThe author considers the application of relevant human rights provisions to the Balkans both historically and in terms of contemporary issues. In particular, he discusses the legality of the measures taken under the auspices of NATO in respect of Kosovo and queries whether such measures are able to remedy such a breakdown of civil administration and respect for human rights. In the author's view, in such circumstances, administration of a country by the United Nations itself provides the only viable alternative.

United Nations Targeted Sanctions, the International Rule of Law and the European Court of Justice's Judgment in Kadi and al-Barakaat

2010 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fredrik Stenhammar
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
International Law ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Financial Assets ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Community Law ◽  
European Court ◽  
Economic Warfare ◽  
Domestic Law ◽  
International Rule

AbstractThis article analyzes the judgment of the European Court of Justice in the Kadi and al-Barakaat case from the perspective of international law and the rule of law among nations. The conclusions drawn are with regard to international law and thus not necessarily decisive for the application of domestic law and Community law to the issue of targeted United Nations (UN) sanctions. It is argued that targeted UN sanctions in the form of blacklisting and freezing of financial assets are lawful under applicable international law as a species of economic warfare. Even if, contrary to expectation, they were unlawful when first introduced, consent and active participation on part of the European states mean that they are in all likelihood precluded from protesting against them now. The European Community Court's judgment cannot affect the validity under international law of targeted UN sanctions. If it turns out that the UN sanctions can no longer be accommodated within Community law, which is an implication but by no means an immediate result of the judgment, it will be for each state to apply its national legislation and continue to implement the sanctions, disregarding Community law if necessary. This would be a serious test of the European states' professed devotion to international law.

scholarly journals Ordre du droit et droit de l'ordre

2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 699-729
Author(s):  
Jacques Zylberberg
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
United Nations ◽  
International Law ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
The State ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
Sovereign State ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Civil And Political Rights

This essay undertakes a review of national and international law to demonstrate that law is mainly an ideological and variable instrument of the State and of the United Nations, which is a by-product of the states. In this perspective, the author opposes the pragmatical ideology of resistance against the sovereign state to the juridical legitimation and the behaviour of the States who reluctantly have conceded some civil and political rights. Those rights are endangered by the growing bureaucratization of the state, the inflation of the juridical norms and rules, in addition to the permanent repressive characters of the State. The criticism of the contradiction and the variation of the rule of law when it relates to "human rights" is also extended to international law as well as to the international organizations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document