scholarly journals A Simple Tool to Predict Transradial Access Fai lure for Coronary Angiography

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Yamada ◽  
Soichiro Washimi ◽  
Sho Hashimoto ◽  
Norimasa Taniguchi ◽  
Shunsuke Nakajima ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (13) ◽  
pp. B772
Author(s):  
Gregory Sgueglia ◽  
Francesco Summaria ◽  
Gaetano Gioffrè ◽  
Fabrizio D’Errico ◽  
Maria Benedetta Giannico ◽  
...  

Angiology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renatomaria Bianchi ◽  
Ludovica D’Acierno ◽  
Mario Crisci ◽  
Donato Tartaglione ◽  
Maurizio Cappelli Bigazzi ◽  
...  

Since the first cardiac catheterization in 1929, this procedure has evolved considerably. Historically performed via the transfemoral access, in the last years, the transradial access has been spreading gradually due to its many advantages. We have conducted a review of published literature concerning efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness, and we analyzed our patients’ data, including the results of the recently published Minimizing Adverse hemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX (MATRIX) study. This review confirmed the superiority of the transradial access compared to the femoral access, especially regarding complications related to the access site, duration of hospitalization, and comfort for the patient. The transradial approach is an excellent option for coronary angiography, and the procedure’s risks are reduced by increased operator experience.


2016 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
On Chen ◽  
Sunny Goel ◽  
Michael Acholonu ◽  
Guy Kulbak ◽  
Shivani Verma ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Roeschl ◽  
Anas Jano ◽  
Franziska Fochler ◽  
Lars S. Maier ◽  
Mona M. Grewe ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: There is a consensus, that transradial-access (TRA) for coronary procedures should be preferred over transfemoral-access (TFA). Previously, forearm-artery-angiography was mainly performed when difficulties during the advancement of the guidewire were encountered. We explored the implication of a standardized forearm-angiography (SFA) on procedural success rates of TRA.Methods: 1191 consecutive cases were assessed retrospectively. Primary TFA rates, crossover to TFA, reasons for forearm-artery-access (FAA) failure, the prevalence of kinking at the level of the forearm and the occurrence of vascular complications were analyzed.Results: Primary FAA access was attempted in 97.9%. Crossover to TFA after a primary or secondary FAA attempt was necessary in 2.8%. Severe kinking was the most frequent cause of FAA failure and occurred in 3.0%. A second or third FAA attempt to avoid TFA was successful in 81%. Severe kinking at the level of the forearm was reported in 1.8%.Conclusion:This is the first study to provide detailed success rates of a primary FAA strategy combined with SFA. While severe kinking proved to be a rare but relevant challenge for FAA success, the prevalence of arterial spasm was marginal. Multiple attempts of FAA to avoid TFA might be safe possibly due to collateral blood supply.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. S22
Author(s):  
Sang Yeub Lee ◽  
Min Kim ◽  
Sang Min Kim ◽  
Jang-Whan Bae ◽  
Kyung-Kuk Hwang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document