scholarly journals Progress on Implementing Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management in the United States Through the Use of Ecosystem Models and Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard Townsend ◽  
Chris J. Harvey ◽  
Yvonne deReynier ◽  
Dawn Davis ◽  
Stephani G. Zador ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Fisheries Management ◽  
The United States ◽  
Ecosystem Models ◽  
Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management

scholarly journals Assessing the State of Coupled Social-Ecological Modeling in Support of Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management in the United States

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Kasperski ◽  
Geret S. DePiper ◽  
Alan C. Haynie ◽  
Suzana Blake ◽  
Lisa L. Colburn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Fisheries Management ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Social Systems ◽  
The United States ◽  
Coupled Models ◽  
Social Ecological ◽  
Resource Managers ◽  
Disciplinary Background ◽  
Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management

There has been a proliferation of coupled social-ecological systems (SES) models created and published in recent years. However, the degree of coupling between natural and social systems varies widely across the different coupled models and is often a function of the disciplinary background of the team conducting the research. This manuscript examines models developed for and used by NOAA Fisheries in support of Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management (EBFM) in the United States. It provides resource managers and interdisciplinary scientists insights on the strengths and weaknesses of the most commonly used SES models: end-to-end models, conceptual models, bioeconomic models, management strategy evaluations (MSEs), fisher behavior models, integrated social vulnerability models, and regional economic impact models. These model types are not unique to the literature, but allow us to differentiate between one-way coupled models – where outputs from one model are inputs into a second model of another discipline with no feedback to the first model, and two-way coupled models – where there are linkages between the natural and social system models. For a model to provide useful strategic or tactical advice, it should only be coupled to the degree necessary to understand the important dynamics/responses of the system and to create management-relevant performance metrics or potential risks from an (in)action. However, one key finding is to not wait to integrate! This paper highlights the importance of “when” the coupling happens, as timing affects the ability to fully address management questions and multi-sectoral usage conflicts that consider the full SES for EBFM or ecosystem based management (EBM) more generally.

Stream Fisheries Management in the United States

Fisheries ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 10-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
William L. Fisher ◽  
Jim P. Burroughs
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Fisheries Management ◽  
The United States

Balancing Fisheries Management and Water Uses for Impounded River Systems

2008 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Fisheries Management ◽  
Reservoir Management ◽  
The United States ◽  
River Systems ◽  
Interstate Disputes ◽  
Water Uses

<em>Abstract</em>.—Litigation regarding reservoir management is increasingly common. I used a range of examples in the United States to show that such litigation is generally ineffective and that most stakeholders can achieve better results through negotiated solutions. This article provides a brief introduction to this type of litigation and illustrates some of its basic limitations. Examples are drawn from several recent interstate disputes of the United States.

An Examination of Progress Toward Ecosystem-Based Management of Living Marine Resources in the U.S.

2021 ◽  
pp. 611-650
Author(s):  
Jason S. Link ◽  
Anthony R. Marshak
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Fisheries Management ◽  
Ecosystem Processes ◽  
Marine Ecosystems ◽  
Environmental Indicators ◽  
Reference Points ◽  
Marine Fishery ◽  
Ecosystem Level ◽  
Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management ◽  
The U.S

This chapter presents a cumulative examination of socioeconomic, governance, ecological, and environmental indicators among the eight major United States (U.S.) marine fishery ecosystems, 26 U.S. subregions, and 14 U.S. participatory regional fisheries management organization (RFMO) jurisdictions. Based on these indicators and as one might expect, some regions are making greater progress toward ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) than others, but in all U.S. marine ecosystems there has been notable progress toward EBFM, albeit on different facets for different regions. Common areas of notable progress toward EBFM are observed around the nation in areas of implementing ecosystem-level planning and advancing understanding of ecosystem processes. Overall, it appears that more inherently productive marine ecosystems tend to have greater biomass, fisheries landings, proportional LMR-based employments, and fisheries revenue. More work remains in areas of ecosystem and community resilience, as well as broader consideration of more systematic measures for a fisheries ecosystem (especially ecosystem-level reference points). Several areas of common challenges and anticipated concerns are identified, with an eye toward focusing efforts on addressing these issues.

United States Law and Policy for Sharing Transboundary, Highly Migratory, and Straddling Stock Fishery Resources

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-225
Author(s):  
Anastasia Telesetsky
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
United States ◽  
Fisheries Management ◽  
The United States ◽  
Fishery Resources ◽  
Law And Policy

Abstract This article describes the United States approach to shared fisheries management highlighting efforts to manage tuna, halibut, salmon and other transboundary species. The article concludes with a recommendation for factoring climate change into U.S. standards for fisheries management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document