scholarly journals Corrigendum: Saccade Latency Provides Evidence for Reduced Face Inversion Effects With Higher Autism Traits

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Laycock ◽  
Kylie Wood ◽  
Andrea Wright ◽  
Sheila G. Crewther ◽  
Melvyn A. Goodale
Author(s):  
Robin Laycock ◽  
Kylie Wood ◽  
Andrea Wright ◽  
Sheila G. Crewther ◽  
Melvyn A. Goodale

2000 ◽  
Vol 17 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 201-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morris Moscovitch ◽  
David A. Moscovitch

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 455-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas W. James ◽  
Lindsay R. Arcurio ◽  
Jason M. Gold

The face inversion effect has been used as a basis for claims about the specialization of face-related perceptual and neural processes. One of these claims is that the fusiform face area (FFA) is the site of face-specific feature-based and/or configural/holistic processes that are responsible for producing the face inversion effect. However, the studies on which these claims were based almost exclusively used stimulus manipulations of whole faces. Here, we tested inversion effects using single, discrete features and combinations of multiple discrete features, in addition to whole faces, using both behavioral and fMRI measurements. In agreement with previous studies, we found behavioral inversion effects with whole faces and no inversion effects with a single eye stimulus or the two eyes in combination. However, we also found behavioral inversion effects with feature combination stimuli that included features in the top and bottom halves (eyes-mouth and eyes-nose-mouth). Activation in the FFA showed an inversion effect for the whole-face stimulus only, which did not match the behavioral pattern. Instead, a pattern of activation consistent with the behavior was found in the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus, which is a component of the extended face-preferring network. The results appear inconsistent with claims that the FFA is the site of face-specific feature-based and/or configural/holistic processes that are responsible for producing the face inversion effect. They are more consistent with claims that the FFA shows a stimulus preference for whole upright faces.


2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miho Nakamura ◽  
Shoko Watanabe ◽  
Masumi Inagaki ◽  
Masahiro Hirai ◽  
Kensaku Miki ◽  
...  

Neuroreport ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 587-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula P. Tavares ◽  
Susana S. Mouga ◽  
Guiomar G. Oliveira ◽  
Miguel Castelo-Branco

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 303-314
Author(s):  
Yasmin Allen-Davidian ◽  
Manuela Russo ◽  
Naohide Yamamoto ◽  
Jordy Kaufman ◽  
Alan J. Pegna ◽  
...  

Face inversion effects occur for both behavioral and electrophysiological responses when people view faces. In EEG, inverted faces are often reported to evoke an enhanced amplitude and delayed latency of the N170 ERP. This response has been attributed to the indexing of specialized face processing mechanisms within the brain. However, inspection of the literature revealed that, although N170 is consistently delayed to a variety of face representations, only photographed faces invoke enhanced N170 amplitudes upon inversion. This suggests that the increased N170 amplitudes to inverted faces may have other origins than the inversion of the face's structure. We hypothesize that the unique N170 amplitude response to inverted photographed faces stems from multiple expectation violations, over and above structural inversion. For instance, rotating an image of a face upside–down not only violates the expectation that faces appear upright but also lifelong priors about illumination and gravity. We recorded EEG while participants viewed face stimuli (upright vs. inverted), where the faces were illuminated from above versus below, and where the models were photographed upright versus hanging upside–down. The N170 amplitudes were found to be modulated by a complex interaction between orientation, lighting, and gravity factors, with the amplitudes largest when faces consistently violated all three expectations. These results confirm our hypothesis that face inversion effects on N170 amplitudes are driven by a violation of the viewer's expectations across several parameters that characterize faces, rather than a disruption in the configurational disposition of its features.


2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 153-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Hussain ◽  
P. J. Bennett ◽  
A. B. Sekuler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document