scholarly journals Implementing Personalized Medicine in the Academic Health Center

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Weiss

Recently we at Partners Health Care had a series of articles in the Journal of Personalized Medicine describing how we are going about implementing Personalized Medicine in an academic health care system [1–10].[...]

Author(s):  
Subhas C. Misra ◽  
Sandip Bisui ◽  
Kamel Fantazy

Among the emerging areas in health-care system, the implementation of Electronic Medical Record system and the discovery of Personalized Medicine are occupying top positions. While some of the personalized drugs have already been discovered, implementing this new medicare system requires a lot of changes in the traditional health-care system. This paper aims at identifying these critical changes required in the adoption of the Personalized Medicine system. A systemic attempt has been made to prepare a list of possible changes required for the adoption based on available literature. This research study shows that changes from reactive to efficient medical care, from trial and error to right treatment for right person at right time, from narrow mind-set to open mindedness, from open information of patients to secure information, from less emphasis on IT infrastructure to more emphasis on IT infrastructure are some of the significant changes that are necessary for implementing the revolutionary medicare system of personalized Medicine.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. e2025197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tian Gu ◽  
Jasmine A. Mack ◽  
Maxwell Salvatore ◽  
Swaraaj Prabhu Sankar ◽  
Thomas S. Valley ◽  
...  

JAMA ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 273 (19) ◽  
pp. 1549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee Goldman

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-6
Author(s):  
Robert Badgett ◽  
Jiatian Chen ◽  
Douglas R. May ◽  
Tom Field ◽  
K. Allen Griener

Introduction. Experts suggest health care institutions switch focusfrom measuring burnout to measuring positive organizational psychology.Concerns include burnout being a late sign of organizationaldecline. The Baldrige survey is promoted by the U.S. Departmentof Commerce to measure positive worksite conditions (e.g., workforcewellbeing of industries, including health care and education).For years, the survey has been completed by managers within organizations,but now the same survey is promoted for completion byan organization’s workforce. We tested the structure of the Baldrigesurvey when completed by an academic health care workforce. Inaddition, we tested whether the results in an academic worksite correlatewith an example metric of an organizational mission.Methods.xIn 2015, our academic health center surveyed facultyand staff with the Baldrige survey. The validity of the Baldrige wastested with confirmatory factor analyses. Within the School of Medicine,responses for the Baldrige’s concepts were correlated againsta measure of organizational outcome: graduates’ assessments ofDepartmental educational quality.Results. The structure of the Baldrige survey did not validate whenassessed by a workforce (RMSEA = 0.086; CFI = 0.829; TLI = 0.815).None of its concepts correlated with learner reported educationalquality.Conclusions. The Baldrige survey, when administered to a workforcerather than managers, did not appear to measure workforcewell-being within an academic health care center. We discourage useof the current survey for this purpose. Kans J Med 2019;12(1):4-6.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenni Buu ◽  
Shantel Mullin ◽  
Carrie McAdam-Marx ◽  
Margaret Solomon ◽  
Brandon T. Jennings

Objective: The objectives of this study were to identify barriers to influenza vaccination recommendation adherence and determine potential methods to improve influenza vaccination rates at the outpatient primary care health centers within an academic health care system. Methods: This descriptive study consisted of a questionnaire distributed to primary care providers at outpatient health centers within an academic health care system. The questionnaire assessed provider opinions regarding knowledge of influenza vaccination recommendations, barriers to following clinical guidelines, and methods to decrease delay of guideline use. Influenza vaccination rates at each of the health centers were also determined through documentation of vaccination for adults who visited a primary care provider during the 2011-2012 influenza season. Vaccination rates were used as a potential model for vaccination recommendation adherence. Results: When providers were asked about barriers to guideline implementation, 75.0% stated lack of awareness that guidelines have been released and 62.5% identified insufficient time to learn new guidelines as barriers. When asked which would be useful to more quickly implement clinical guidelines, respondents selected education for providers of new guidelines (79.2%), reminders in the electronic medical record (62.5%), and involvement of other health care professionals including pharmacists (54.2%) as potential strategies. Most questionnaire respondents (70.8%) strongly agreed that well-developed guidelines would improve quality of care at their practice site. During the 2011-2012 influenza season, 26.0% of 67,827 adults with an office visit at all outpatient health centers had documentation of administration of an influenza vaccine. Conclusion: Influenza vaccination rates at the outpatient primary care health centers at this academic health care system represent an area for improvement. Provider perceived barriers to clinical practice guideline implementation and adherence at the health centers include lack of awareness of new guidelines and lack of resources such as time and personnel to follow all recommendations. A health care system-wide process needs to be created to better identify strategies to improve adherence to influenza vaccination recommendations and vaccination documentation.   Type: Original Research


Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1168-P
Author(s):  
RODOLFO J. GALINDO ◽  
LIMIN PENG ◽  
ZIRKA T. SMITH ◽  
SOL JACOBS ◽  
MARJAN K. KHOSRAVANIPOUR ◽  
...  

1977 ◽  
Vol 11 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 71S-74S ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Barofsky

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document