scholarly journals Acupuncture for ‘frequent attenders’ with medically unexplained symptoms

2011 ◽  
Vol 61 (589) ◽  
pp. 493.2-494
Author(s):  
Les Rose
2003 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 519-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. REID ◽  
T. CRAYFORD ◽  
A. PATEL ◽  
S. WESSELY ◽  
M. HOTOPF

Background. There are few longitudinal studies of patients with medically unexplained symptoms. The aim of this study was to investigate outcome in frequent attenders in secondary care who present repeatedly with medically unexplained symptoms.Method. Forty-eight patients presenting with medically unexplained symptoms, from a sample of 61, participated in a 3-year follow-up study. Psychiatric morbidity, functional impairment and use of services were evaluated.Results. At follow-up there was a high prevalence of psychiatric morbidity with 69% having at least one psychiatric diagnosis. The sample continued to be high users of a range of health services and substantial functional impairment was reported.Conclusion. In this group of frequent attenders with medically unexplained symptoms outcome as measured by psychiatric morbidity, service use and functional impairment remained poor after 3 years.


2021 ◽  
pp. clinmed.2020-1093
Author(s):  
Natasha Faye Daniels ◽  
Raiiq Ridwan ◽  
Ed B G Barnard ◽  
Talha Muneer Amanullah ◽  
Catherine Hayhurst

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 294-302
Author(s):  
Oded Hammerman ◽  
Daniel Halperin ◽  
Daniel Tsalihin ◽  
Dan Greenberg ◽  
Talma Kushnir ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Faye Daniels ◽  
Raiiq Ridwan ◽  
Edward BG Barnard ◽  
Talha Muneer Amanullah ◽  
Catherine Hayhurst

Background Medically Unexplained Symptoms (MUS) refer to symptoms with no identified organic aetiology, and are amongst the most challenging for patients and Emergency Department (ED) staff. Providers working in our ED perceived an increase in severity and frequency of these types of presentations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods A retrospective list of frequent attenders (FA) presenting five or more times to the ED between two 122-day periods were examined: 01 Mar to 30 Jun 2019 (Control) and 2020 (COVID-19). The FA group were then examined to identify patients presenting with MUS (FA-MUS). Results The total number of ED attendances during the control period was n=42,785 which reduced to n=28,806 in the COVID-19 period, a decrease of 32.7%. The control FA cohort had n=44 FA-MUS patients with 149 ED visits. This increased to n=65 FA-MUS patients with 267 visits during COVID-19, p=0.44. There was a significant increase in the proportion of all ED visits that were FA-MUS: 0.3% (control) compared to 0.9% (COVID-19); OR 2.7, p<0.001. There was a significant increase in shortness of breath amongst MUS during the COVID-19 pandemic relative to the control period (p<0.01), with no significant difference in any other MUS category. Conclusion Whilst the total number of ED attendances reduced by almost one third during COVID-19, the actual number of all visits by frequent attenders with MUS increased and the proportion of attendances by these tripled during the same period. This presents an increasing challenge to ED clinicians who may feel underprepared to manage these patients effectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document