Faculty Opinions recommendation of Developmental changes underlying the formation of the specialized time coding circuits in barn owls (Tyto alba).

Author(s):  
Geoffrey A Manley
2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (17) ◽  
pp. 7671-7679 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Fabiana Kubke ◽  
Dino P. Massoglia ◽  
Catherine E. Carr

2021 ◽  
Vol 785 ◽  
pp. 147403
Author(s):  
Ségolène Humann-Guilleminot ◽  
Shirley Laurent ◽  
Pierre Bize ◽  
Alexandre Roulin ◽  
Gaétan Glauser ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Vivien Cosandey ◽  
Robin Séchaud ◽  
Paul Béziers ◽  
Yannick Chittaro ◽  
Andreas Sanchez ◽  
...  

AbstractBird nests are specialized habitats because of their particular composition including nest detritus and bird droppings. In consequence, they attract a specialized arthropod community considered as nidicolous, which includes species only found in bird nests (strictly nidicolous) or sometimes found in bird nests (facultatively nidicolous). Because the factors influencing the entomofauna in bird nests are poorly understood, in autumn 2019, we collected nest material in 86 Barn Owl (Tyto alba) nest boxes. We investigated whether the invertebrate species richness was related to Barn Owl nest box occupancy, the density of available nest boxes and the landscape structure. We found 3,321 nidicolous beetle specimens belonging to 24 species. Species richness of strictly nidicolous beetles was 2.7 times higher in nest boxes occupied by a family of Barn Owls the previous spring compared to unoccupied nest boxes. It was also higher in sites that were more often occupied by Barn Owls in the five previous years and in areas surrounded by a higher proportion of crop fields. For facultatively nidicolous beetles, the density of Barn Owl nest boxes enhanced the species richness. In conclusion, our study suggests that the strictly nidicolous beetles benefit from occupied nest boxes of Barn Owls, whereas facultatively nidicolous beetles look for nest boxes independently of whether Barn Owls occupy them. Our study highlights the importance of bird nests for a suite of invertebrates.


1986 ◽  
Vol 28 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 122-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine E. Carr
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven G. Platt ◽  
Thomas R. Rainwater ◽  
Daniel J. Leavitt ◽  
Stanlee M. Miller
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 6204-6213
Author(s):  
A. Mohamed Samsoor Ali ◽  
R. Santhanakrishnan
Keyword(s):  

1999 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. E. Carr ◽  
M. A. Friedman

The auditory and electrosensory systems contain circuits that are specialized for the encoding and processing of microsecond time differences. Analysis of these circuits in two specialists, weakly electric fish and barn owls, has uncovered common design principles and illuminated some aspects of their evolution.


Bird Study ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 570-573
Author(s):  
Robin Séchaud ◽  
Ana Paula Machado ◽  
Kim Schalcher ◽  
Céline Simon ◽  
Alexandre Roulin
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 912-926
Author(s):  
Arkadeb Dutta ◽  
Tidhar Lev-Ari ◽  
Ouriel Barzilay ◽  
Rotem Mairon ◽  
Alon Wolf ◽  
...  

Segregation of objects from the background is a basic and essential property of the visual system. We studied the neural detection of objects defined by orientation difference from background in barn owls ( Tyto alba). We presented wide-field displays of densely packed stripes with a dominant orientation. Visual objects were created by orienting a circular patch differently from the background. In head-fixed conditions, neurons in both tecto- and thalamofugal visual pathways (optic tectum and visual Wulst) were weakly responsive to these objects in their receptive fields. However, notably, in freely viewing conditions, barn owls occasionally perform peculiar side-to-side head motions (peering) when scanning the environment. In the second part of the study we thus recorded the neural response from head-fixed owls while the visual displays replicated the peering conditions; i.e., the displays (objects and backgrounds) were shifted along trajectories that induced a retinal motion identical to sampled peering motions during viewing of a static object. These conditions induced dramatic neural responses to the objects, in the very same neurons that where unresponsive to the objects in static displays. By reverting to circular motions of the display, we show that the pattern of the neural response is mostly shaped by the orientation of the background relative to motion and not the orientation of the object. Thus our findings provide evidence that peering and/or other self-motions can facilitate orientation-based figure-ground segregation through interaction with inhibition from the surround. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Animals frequently move their sensory organs and thereby create motion cues that can enhance object segregation from background. We address a special example of such active sensing, in barn owls. When scanning the environment, barn owls occasionally perform small-amplitude side-to-side head movements called peering. We show that the visual outcome of such peering movements elicit neural detection of objects that are rotated from the dominant orientation of the background scene and which are otherwise mostly undetected. These results suggest a novel role for self-motions in sensing objects that break the regular orientation of elements in the scene.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document