Faculty Opinions recommendation of Development of reorganization of the auditory cortex caused by fear conditioning: effect of atropine.

Author(s):  
Richard H Masland
2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 1384-1396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiqing Ji ◽  
Nobuo Suga

Experience-dependent plastic changes in the central sensory systems are due to activation of both the sensory and neuromodulatory systems. Nonspecific changes of cortical auditory neurons elicited by pseudoconditioning are quite different from tone-specific changes of the neurons elicited by auditory fear conditioning. Therefore the neural circuit evoking the nonspecific changes must also be different from that evoking the tone-specific changes. We first examined changes in the response properties of cortical auditory neurons of the big brown bat elicited by pseudoconditioning with unpaired tonal (CSu) and electric leg (USu) stimuli and found that it elicited nonspecific changes to CSu (a heart-rate decrease, an auditory response increase, a broadening of frequency tuning, and a decrease in threshold) and, in addition, a small tone-specific change to CSu (a small short-lasting best-frequency shift) only when CSu frequency was 5 kHz lower than the best frequency of a recorded neuron. We then examined the effects of drugs on the cortical changes elicited by the pseudoconditioning. The development of the nonspecific changes was scarcely affected by atropine (a muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonist) and mecamylamine (a nicotinic cholinergic receptor antagonist) applied to the auditory cortex and by muscimol (a GABAA-receptor agonist) applied to the somatosensory cortex. However, these drugs abolished the small short-lasting tone-specific change as they abolished the large long-lasting tone-specific change elicited by auditory fear conditioning. Our current results indicate that, different from the tone-specific change, the nonspecific changes depend on neither the cholinergic neuromodulator nor the somatosensory cortex.


2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshinori Ide ◽  
Muneyoshi Takahashi ◽  
Johan Lauwereyns ◽  
Guy Sandner ◽  
Minoru Tsukada ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 314-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Peter ◽  
H. Scheuch ◽  
T. R. Burkard ◽  
J. Tinter ◽  
T. Wernle ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine C. Wood ◽  
Christopher F. Angeloni ◽  
Karmi Oxman ◽  
Claudia Clopath ◽  
Maria N. Geffen

SummaryLearning to avoid dangerous signals while preserving normal behavioral responses to safe stimuli is essential for everyday behavior and survival. Like other forms of learning, fear learning has a high level of inter-subject variability. Following an identical fear conditioning protocol, different subjects exhibit a range of fear specificity. Under high specificity, subjects specialize fear to only the paired (dangerous) stimulus, whereas under low specificity, subjects generalize fear to other (safe) sensory stimuli. Pathological fear generalization underlies emotional disorders, such as post-traumatic stress disorder. Despite decades of work, the neuronal basis that determines fear specificity level remains unknown. We identified the neuronal code that underlies variability in fear specificity. We performed longitudinal imaging of activity of neuronal ensembles in the auditory cortex of mice prior to and after the mice were subjected to differential fear conditioning. The neuronal code in the auditory cortex prior to learning predicted the level of specificity following fear learning across subjects. After fear learning, population neuronal responses were reorganized: the responses to the safe stimulus decreased, whereas the responses to the dangerous stimulus remained the same, rather than decreasing as in pseudo-conditioned subjects. The magnitude of these changes, however, did not correlate with learning specificity, suggesting that they did not reflect the fear memory. Together, our results identify a new, temporally restricted, function for cortical activity in associative learning. These results reconcile seemingly conflicting previous findings and provide for a neuronal code for determining individual patterns in learning.


2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (37) ◽  
pp. 9306-9311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cora Sau Wan Lai ◽  
Avital Adler ◽  
Wen-Biao Gan

Fear conditioning-induced behavioral responses can be extinguished after fear extinction. While fear extinction is generally thought to be a form of new learning, several lines of evidence suggest that neuronal changes associated with fear conditioning could be reversed after fear extinction. To better understand how fear conditioning and extinction modify synaptic circuits, we examined changes of postsynaptic dendritic spines of layer V pyramidal neurons in the mouse auditory cortex over time using transcranial two-photon microscopy. We found that auditory-cued fear conditioning induced the formation of new dendritic spines within 2 days. The survived new spines induced by fear conditioning with one auditory cue were clustered within dendritic branch segments and spatially segregated from new spines induced by fear conditioning with a different auditory cue. Importantly, fear extinction preferentially caused the elimination of newly formed spines induced by fear conditioning in an auditory cue-specific manner. Furthermore, after fear extinction, fear reconditioning induced reformation of new dendritic spines in close proximity to the sites of new spine formation induced by previous fear conditioning. These results show that fear conditioning, extinction, and reconditioning induce cue- and location-specific dendritic spine remodeling in the auditory cortex. They also suggest that changes of synaptic connections induced by fear conditioning are reversed after fear extinction.


Author(s):  
Yoshinori Ide ◽  
Muneyoshi Takahashi ◽  
Johan Lauwereyns ◽  
Minoru Tsukada ◽  
Takeshi Aihara

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document