scholarly journals Tone-Specific and Nonspecific Plasticity of the Auditory Cortex Elicited by Pseudoconditioning: Role of Acetylcholine Receptors and the Somatosensory Cortex

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 1384-1396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiqing Ji ◽  
Nobuo Suga
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Receptor Antagonist ◽  
Fear Conditioning ◽  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Acetylcholine Receptors ◽  
Neural Circuit ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Cholinergic Receptor ◽  
Auditory Neurons ◽  
Specific Change

Experience-dependent plastic changes in the central sensory systems are due to activation of both the sensory and neuromodulatory systems. Nonspecific changes of cortical auditory neurons elicited by pseudoconditioning are quite different from tone-specific changes of the neurons elicited by auditory fear conditioning. Therefore the neural circuit evoking the nonspecific changes must also be different from that evoking the tone-specific changes. We first examined changes in the response properties of cortical auditory neurons of the big brown bat elicited by pseudoconditioning with unpaired tonal (CSu) and electric leg (USu) stimuli and found that it elicited nonspecific changes to CSu (a heart-rate decrease, an auditory response increase, a broadening of frequency tuning, and a decrease in threshold) and, in addition, a small tone-specific change to CSu (a small short-lasting best-frequency shift) only when CSu frequency was 5 kHz lower than the best frequency of a recorded neuron. We then examined the effects of drugs on the cortical changes elicited by the pseudoconditioning. The development of the nonspecific changes was scarcely affected by atropine (a muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonist) and mecamylamine (a nicotinic cholinergic receptor antagonist) applied to the auditory cortex and by muscimol (a GABAA-receptor agonist) applied to the somatosensory cortex. However, these drugs abolished the small short-lasting tone-specific change as they abolished the large long-lasting tone-specific change elicited by auditory fear conditioning. Our current results indicate that, different from the tone-specific change, the nonspecific changes depend on neither the cholinergic neuromodulator nor the somatosensory cortex.

scholarly journals Effects of Acetylcholine and Atropine on Plasticity of Central Auditory Neurons Caused by Conditioning in Bats

2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiqing Ji ◽  
Enquan Gao ◽  
Nobuo Suga
Keyword(s):  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Basal Forebrain ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Auditory Neurons ◽  
Tuning Curves ◽  
Acoustic Stimuli ◽  
Cholinergic Basal Forebrain ◽  
Big Brown Bat ◽  
Central Auditory Neurons

In the big brown bat ( Eptesicus fuscus), conditioning with acoustic stimuli followed by electric leg-stimulation causes shifts in frequency-tuning curves and best frequencies (hereafter BF shifts) of collicular and cortical neurons, i.e., reorganization of the cochleotopic (frequency) maps in the inferior colliculus (IC) and auditory cortex (AC). The collicular BF shift recovers 180 min after the conditioning, but the cortical BF shift lasts longer than 26 h. The collicular BF shift is not caused by conditioning, as the AC is inactivated during conditioning. Therefore it has been concluded that the collicular BF shift is caused by the corticofugal auditory system. The collicular and cortical BF shifts both are not caused by conditioning as the somatosensory cortex is inactivated during conditioning. Therefore it has been hypothesized that the cortical BF shift is mostly caused by both the subcortical (e.g., collicular) BF shift and the activity of nonauditory systems such as the somatosensory cortex excited by an unconditioned leg-stimulation and the cholinergic basal forebrain. The main aims of our present studies are to examine whether acetylcholine (ACh) applied to the AC augments the collicular and cortical BF shifts caused by the conditioning and whether atropine applied to the AC abolishes the cortical BF shift but not the collicular BF shift, as expected from the preceding hypothesis. In the awake bat, we made the following findings. ACh applied to the AC augments not only the cortical BF shift but also the collicular BF shift through the corticofugal system. Atropine applied to the AC reduces the collicular BF shift and abolishes the cortical BF shift which otherwise would be caused. ACh applied to the IC significantly augments the collicular BF shift but affects the cortical BF shift only slightly. ACh makes the cortical BF shift long-lasting beyond 4 h, but it cannot make the collicular BF shift long-lasting beyond 3 h. Atropine applied to the IC abolishes the collicular BF shift. It reduces the cortical BF shift but does not abolish it. Our findings favor the hypothesis that the BF shifts evoked by the corticofugal system, and an increased ACh level in the AC evoked by the basal forebrain are both necessary to evoke a long-lasting cortical BF shift.

scholarly journals Corticofugal Feedback for Collicular Plasticity Evoked by Electric Stimulation of the Inferior Colliculus

2005 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 2676-2682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongkui Zhang ◽  
Nobuo Suga
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Inferior Colliculus ◽  
Acetylcholine Receptors ◽  
Electric Stimulation ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Acoustic Stimulus ◽  
Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors ◽  
Corticofugal Feedback ◽  
Stimulation Of

Focal electric stimulation of the auditory cortex, 30-min repetitive acoustic stimulation, and auditory fear conditioning each evoke shifts of the frequency-tuning curves [hereafter, best frequency (BF) shifts] of cortical and collicular neurons. The short-term collicular BF shift is produced by the corticofugal system and primarily depends on the relationship in BF between a recorded collicular and a stimulated cortical neuron or between the BF of a recorded collicular neuron and the frequency of an acoustic stimulus. However, it has been unknown whether focal electric stimulation of the inferior colliculus evokes the collicular BF shift and whether the collicular BF shift, if evoked, depends on corticofugal feedback. In our present research with the awake big brown bat, we found that focal electric stimulation of collicular neurons evoked the BF shifts of collicular neurons located near the stimulated ones; that there were two types of BF shifts: centripetal and centrifugal BF shifts, i.e., shifts toward and shifts away from the BF of stimulated neurons, respectively; and that the development of these collicular BF shifts was blocked by inactivation of the auditory cortex. Our data indicate that the collicular BF shifts (plasticity) evoked by collicular electric stimulation depended on corticofugal feedback. It should be noted that collicular BF shifts also depend on acetylcholine because it has been demonstrated that atropine (an antagonist of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors) applied to the IC blocks the development of collicular BF shifts.

The Effect of Weak Background Noise on The Frequency Tuning of Neurons in The Rat Auditory Cortex*

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 1082-1088
Author(s):  
Yin-Ting PENG ◽  
Qing PU ◽  
Xin-De SUN ◽  
Ji-Ping ZHANG
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Background Noise ◽  
Frequency Tuning

Spinal Endogenous Acetylcholine Contributes to the Analgesic Effect of Systemic Morphine in Rats

2001 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 525-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shao-Rui Chen ◽  
Hui-Lin Pan
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Receptor Antagonist ◽  
Analgesic Effect ◽  
Antinociceptive Effect ◽  
Intrathecal Injection ◽  
Radiant Heat ◽  
Cholinergic Receptor ◽  
Inhibitory Effect ◽  
Withdrawal Latency ◽  
Aziridinium Ion

Background Systemic morphine is known to cause increased release of acetyicholine in the spinal cord. Intrathecal injection of the cholinergic receptor agonists or acetyicholinesterase inhibitors produces antinociception in both animals and humans. In the present study, we explored the functional importance of spinal endogenous acetylcholine in the analgesic action produced by intravenous morphine. Methods Rats were implanted with intravenous and intrathecal catheters. The antinociceptive effect of morphine was determined by the paw-withdrawal latency in response to a radiant heat stimulus after intrathecal treatment with atropine (a muscarinic receptor antagonist), mecamylamine (a nicotinic receptor antagonist), or cholinergic neurotoxins (ethylcholine mustard aziridinium ion [AF64A] and hemicholinium-3). Results Intravenous injection of 2.5 mg/kg morphine increased significantly the paw-withdrawal latency. Intrathecal pretreatment with 30 microg atropine (n = 7) or 50 microg mecamylamine (n = 6) both attenuated significantly the antinociceptive effect of morphine. The inhibitory effect of atropine on the effect of morphine was greater than that of mecamylanilne. Furthermore, the antinociceptive effect of morphine was significantly reduced in rats pretreated with intrathecal AF64A (n = 7) or hemicholinium-3 (n = 6) to inhibit the high-affinity choline transporter and acetylcholine synthesis. We found that intrathecal AF64A reduced significantly the [3H]hemicholinium-3 binding sites but did not affect its affinity in the dorsal spinal cord. Conclusions The data in the current study indicate that spinal endogenous acetylcholine plays an important role in mediating the analgesic effect of systemic morphine through both muscarinic and nicotinic receptors.

scholarly journals Broadened Population-Level Frequency Tuning in Human Auditory Cortex of Portable Music Player Users

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. e17022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidehiko Okamoto ◽  
Henning Teismann ◽  
Ryusuke Kakigi ◽  
Christo Pantev
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Population Level ◽  
Human Auditory Cortex ◽  
Music Player

Monaural inhibition in cat auditory cortex

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 1876-1891 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. B. Calford ◽  
M. N. Semple
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Lateral Inhibition ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Inhibitory Response ◽  
Forward Masking ◽  
Excitatory Response ◽  
Rate Level ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Response Area

1. Several studies of auditory cortex have examined the competitive inhibition that can occur when appropriate sounds are presented to each ear. However, most cortical neurons also show both excitation and inhibition in response to presentation of stimuli at one ear alone. The extent of such inhibition has not been described. Forward masking, in which a variable masking stimulus was followed by a fixed probe stimulus (within the excitatory response area), was used to examine the extent of monaural inhibition for neurons in primary auditory cortex of anesthetized cats (barbiturate or barbiturate-ketamine). Both the masking and probe stimuli were 50-ms tone pips presented to the contralateral ear. Most cortical neurons showed significant forward masking at delays beyond which masking effects in the auditory nerve are relatively small compared with those seen in cortical neurons. Analysis was primarily concerned with such components. Standard rate-level functions were also obtained and were examined for nonmonotonicity, an indication of level-dependent monaural inhibition. 2. Consistent with previous reports, a wide range of frequency tuning properties (excitatory response area shapes) was found in cortical neurons. This was matched by a wide range of forward-masking-derived inhibitory response areas. At the most basic level of analysis, these were classified according to the presence of lateral inhibition, i.e., where a probe tone at a neuron's characteristic frequency was masked by tones outside the limits of the excitatory response area. Lateral inhibition was a property of 38% of the sampled neurons. Such neurons represented 77% of those with nonmonotonic rate-level functions, indicating a strong correlation between the two indexes of monaural inhibition; however, the shapes of forward masking inhibitory response areas did not usually correspond with those required to account for the "tuning" of a neuron. In addition, it was found that level-dependent inhibition was not added to by forward masking inhibition. 3. Analysis of the discharges to individual stimulus pair presentations, under conditions of partial masking, revealed that discharges to the probe occurred independently of discharges to the preceding masker. This indicates that even when the masker is within a neuron's excitatory response area, forward masking is not a postdischarge habituation phenomenon. However, for most neurons the degree of masking summed over multiple stimulus presentations appears determined by the same stimulus parameters that determine the probability of response to the masker.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document