Faculty Opinions recommendation of The expectation effect and cardiac pacing for refractory vasovagal syncope.

Author(s):  
Brian Olshansky
2007 ◽  
Vol 120 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachin Sud ◽  
David Massel ◽  
George J. Klein ◽  
Peter Leong-Sit ◽  
Raymond Yee ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 328 (15) ◽  
pp. 1085-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasbir S. Sra ◽  
Mohammad R. Jazayeri ◽  
Boaz Avitall ◽  
Anwer Dhala ◽  
Sanjay Deshpande ◽  
...  

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 2024-2028
Author(s):  
Jean-Claude Deharo

Reflex syncope, also called neurally mediated syncope, accounts for 56–73% of the aetiologies of syncope, with a balanced incidence over the various age categories. The most common form is ‘vasovagal syncope’ where the trigger is pain, fever, instrumentation, emotion, or orthostatic stress; ‘situational syncope’ refers to syncope triggered by a specific situation, that is, micturition, defecation, swallowing, cough; and ‘carotid sinus syncope’, which may be triggered by carotid sinus manipulation or diagnosed in patients with syncope and positive carotid sinus massage. The term ‘atypical reflex syncope’ is used to describe reflex syncope occurring without an apparent trigger: the diagnosis is mainly based on history, exclusion of other causes of syncope, and a positive head-up tilt test. Although recent developments have prompted new pathophysiological hypotheses, including the adenosine pathway, the diagnostic strategy for reflex syncope remains mainly based on clinical evaluation and very few ancillary diagnostic tests. The pharmacological armament is still very limited while new perspectives have been opened for specific subgroup of patients. Regarding the very rare patients who are candidates for permanent cardiac pacing, a new pragmatic approach may help their selection and the prediction of the effect of pacing.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Brignole ◽  
Marco Tomaino ◽  
Alessio Gargaro

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 417-420
Author(s):  
Masataka Sumiyoshi

2016 ◽  
Vol 144 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 597-601
Author(s):  
Nikola Radovanovic ◽  
Bratislav Kircanski ◽  
Srdjan Raspopovic ◽  
Sinisa Pavlovic ◽  
Velibor Jovanovic ◽  
...  

Introduction. Vasovagal syncope is the most common type of reflex syncope. Efficacy of cardiac pacing in this indication has not been the subject of many studies and pacemaker therapy in patients with vasovagal syncope is still controversial. Objective. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pacing therapy in treatment of patients with vasovagal syncope, to determine contribution of new therapeutic models in increasing its success, and to identify risk factors associated with a higher rate of symptoms after pacemaker implantation. Methods. A retrospective study included 30 patients with pacemaker implanted due to vasovagal syncope in the Pacemaker Center, Clinical Center of Serbia, between November 2003 and June 2014. Head-up tilt test was performed to diagnose vasovagal syncope. Patients with cardioinhibitory and mixed type of disease were enrolled in the study. Results. Mean age was 48.1 ? 11.1 years and 18 (60%) patients were men. Mean follow-up period was 5.9 ? 3.0 years. Primarily, implantable loop recorder was implanted in 10 (33.3%) patients. Twenty (66.7%) patients presented cardioinhibitory and 10 (33.3%) mixed type of vasovagal syncope. After pacemaker implantation, 11 (36.7%) patients had syncope. In multiple logistic regression analysis we showed that syncope is statistically more likely to occur after pacemaker implantation in patients with mixed type of vasovagal syncope (p = 0.018). There were two (6.7%) perioperative surgical complications. Conclusion. Pacemaker therapy is a safe treatment for patients with vasovagal syncope, whose efficacy can be improved by strict selection of patients. We showed that symptoms occur statistically more often in patients with mixed type of disease after pacemaker implantation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document