Faculty Opinions recommendation of Sweet taste receptors in rat small intestine stimulate glucose absorption through apical GLUT2.

Author(s):  
Richard J Naftalin
2007 ◽  
Vol 582 (1) ◽  
pp. 379-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver J. Mace ◽  
Julie Affleck ◽  
Nick Patel ◽  
George L. Kellett

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 302-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Dyer ◽  
K.S.H. Salmon ◽  
L. Zibrik ◽  
S.P. Shirazi-Beechey

The composition of the intestinal luminal content varies considerably with diet. It is important therefore that the intestinal epithelium senses and responds to these significant changes and regulates its functions accordingly. Although it is becoming evident that the gut epithelium senses and responds to luminal nutrients, little is known about the nature of the nutrient sensing molecule and the downstream cellular events. A prototype example is the modulation in the capacity of the gut to absorb monosaccharides via the intestinal luminal membrane Na+/glucose cotransporter, SGLT1. The experimental evidence suggests that luminal sugar is sensed by a glucose sensor residing on the luminal membrane of the gut epithelium and linked to a G-protein-coupled receptor, cAMP/PKA (protein kinase A) pathway, resulting ultimately in modulation of intestinal monosaccharide absorption. Here we report the expression, at mRNA and protein levels, of members of the T1R sweet taste receptors, and the α-subunit of the G-protein gustducin, in the small intestine and the enteroendocrine cell line, STC-1. In the small intestine, there is a highly coordinated expression of sweet taste receptors and gustducin, a G-protein implicated in intracellular taste signal transduction, throughout the gut. The potential involvement of these receptors in sugar sensing in the intestine will facilitate our understanding of intestinal nutrient sensing, with implications for better nutrition and health maintenance.


2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (10) ◽  
pp. 1415-1420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew G. Renwick ◽  
Samuel V. Molinary

The present review explores the interactions between sweeteners and enteroendocrine cells, and consequences for glucose absorption and insulin release. A combination of in vitro,in situ, molecular biology and clinical studies has formed the basis of our knowledge about the taste receptor proteins in the glucose-sensing enteroendocrine cells and the secretion of incretins by these cells. Low-energy (intense) sweeteners have been used as tools to define the role of intestinal sweet-taste receptors in glucose absorption. Recent studies using animal and human cell lines and knockout mice have shown that low-energy sweeteners can stimulate intestinal enteroendocrine cells to release glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide. These studies have given rise to major speculations that the ingestion of food and beverages containing low-energy sweeteners may act via these intestinal mechanisms to increase obesity and the metabolic syndrome due to a loss of equilibrium between taste receptor activation, nutrient assimilation and appetite. However, data from numerous publications on the effects of low-energy sweeteners on appetite, insulin and glucose levels, food intake and body weight have shown that there is no consistent evidence that low-energy sweeteners increase appetite or subsequent food intake, cause insulin release or affect blood pressure in normal subjects. Thus, the data from extensive in vivo studies in human subjects show that low-energy sweeteners do not have any of the adverse effects predicted by in vitro,in situ or knockout studies in animals.


2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (05) ◽  
pp. 329-335
Author(s):  
Minchun Zhang ◽  
Rilu Feng ◽  
Jiang Yue ◽  
Cheng Qian ◽  
Mei Yang ◽  
...  

AbstractDisordered intestinal sweet taste receptors (STRs) are implicated in glucose homeostasis by involving in incretin secretion and glucose absorption. However, the effects of antidiabetic medications on STRs, downstream molecules, and glucose transporters expression are unknown. In our study, ZDF rats (n=24) were randomly treated by metformin (MET, 215.15 mg/kg), sitagliptin (SIT, 10.76 mg/kg), or saline for 4 weeks. Fasting blood glucose and insulin levels were measured, and HOMA-IR and QUICKI index were calculated. One week later, we detected relative mRNA expression of T1R2/T1R3, α-gustducin, TRPM5 and glucose transporters including SGLT1, SGLT2, and GLUT2 in the small intestine and kidney. We found that though both metformin and sitagliptin effectively decreased fasting blood glucose, only metformin improved HOMA-IR and QUICKI (p<0.05). MRNA levels of STRs and sweet taste molecules in duodenum and jejunum were not different among three groups, but those in ileum were dramatically upregulated after SIT (vs. MET p<0.05; vs. CON p<0.01). SGLT1 and GLUT2 in ileum were markedly increased after SIT (p<0.01). In the kidney, expression of SGLT2 and GLUT2 were downregulated in both SIT and MET group (p<0.05). In conclusion, metformin and sitagliptin exerted different effects on expression of STRs and glucose transporters in the gut and kidney. STRs, downstream molecules, and glucose transporters in distal small intestinal were sensitively increased in response to sitagliptin than metformin treatment. Renal glucose transporters were downregulated after metformin and sitagliptin treatment.


Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 495-P
Author(s):  
LUPING ZHOU ◽  
WEI HUANG ◽  
NAN LIU ◽  
XIU M. MA ◽  
MAN GUO ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 649-654
Author(s):  
Masahiko TSUCHIYA ◽  
Shuji INOUE ◽  
Masayuki SATTA ◽  
Hideki YOSHIMURA ◽  
Masataka ARITA ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 183 (2) ◽  
pp. 606-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rizwan M. Chaudhry ◽  
Alok Garg ◽  
Mohamed M. Abdelfatah ◽  
Judith A. Duenes ◽  
Michael G. Sarr

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document