Faculty Opinions recommendation of Quality-improvement research and informed consent.

Author(s):  
Claude Guerin ◽  
Ghislain Flandreau
2008 ◽  
Vol 358 (8) ◽  
pp. 765-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franklin G. Miller ◽  
Ezekiel J. Emanuel

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. S3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alene Toulany ◽  
Rory McQuillan ◽  
Jennifer D Thull-Freedman ◽  
Peter A Margolis

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirley T Bristol ◽  
Rodney W Hicks

Successful clinical research outcomes are essential for improving patient care. Achieving this goal, however, implies an effective informed consent process for potential research participants. This article traces the development of ethical and legal requirements of informed consent and examines the effectiveness of past and current practice. The authors propose the use of innovative monitoring methodologies to improve outcomes while safeguarding consent relationships and activities. Additional rigorous research will help direct policy efforts at standardizing quality improvement processes.


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. S12-S13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Kairys ◽  
Richard Wasserman ◽  
Wilson Pace

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 189-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas L. Wooster ◽  
Mary E. Angelson ◽  
David M. Williams

The Quality Improvement and Research Committee of the Society for Vascular Ultrasound has recognized the Journal for Vascular Ultrasound to promote quality improvement, research and scholarly initiatives of the Society. An understanding of the content and character of its published articles and its status amongst journals on vascular ultrasound will be useful to this mandate. This project aims to identify the scope of Journal for Vascular Ultrasound and its implications for the Society membership. Journal for Vascular Ultrasound Volumes 40 to 42 (2016-2018) were reviewed to identify the number of articles published, the type of scholarly work, and the vascular ultrasound domains represented. The findings were compared with major databases and a targeted list of journals with vascular ultrasound content. In addition, bibliometric parameters specific to Journal for Vascular Ultrasound were identified and compared with other journals. The Journal for Vascular Ultrasound published 71 articles over the 3 years; 100% were vascular ultrasound topics. The most frequent activities were 35 cases, 20 research, and 5 guidelines. The topics were 19 venous, 18 carotid, 7 arterial, 2 aorta, 1 education, and 10 unusual findings, and 4 other studies. In the 312 targeted journals, 4792 articles were published in 2018; 135 were relevant to vascular ultrasound. The maximum vascular ultrasound content in any one journal, other than Journal for Vascular Ultrasound, was 20% (range = 0-20, median = 8%). The impact of Journal for Vascular Ultrasound, by the H-score of 11 and SJR of 0.12, ranks the Journal for Vascular Ultrasound in the lowest 10% of surveyed journals. Of the citable Journal for Vascular Ultrasound articles, only 6% were cited in bibliometric analysis. The Journal for Vascular Ultrasound has the highest percentage of content of vascular ultrasound of targeted journals. Case reports represent the bulk of Journal for Vascular Ultrasound published work. Citations and impact remain low. None of the targeted journals have very much content in vascular ultrasound. These findings suggest a variety of challenges and opportunities for the Society.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document