Faculty Opinions recommendation of Ultrasound-guided anterior approach to sciatic nerve block: a comparison with the posterior approach.

Author(s):  
Vincent Chan ◽  
Ki Jinn Chin ◽  
Anahi Perlas
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (Suppl. 1) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
M. A. Fondi ◽  
A. Picarazzi ◽  
A. Bella ◽  
C. M. Posteraro ◽  
P. Dauri

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 104-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
M FONDI ◽  
A PICARAZZI ◽  
A BELLA ◽  
C POSTERARO ◽  
P DAURI

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Babak Khabiri ◽  
Charles Hamilton ◽  
John Norton ◽  
Fernando Arbona

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 1641-1647
Author(s):  
Ha‐Jung Kim ◽  
Ki Jinn Chin ◽  
Hyungtae Kim ◽  
Hwa‐young Jang ◽  
Seong‐il Bin ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 303-303
Author(s):  
V. A. Fominykh ◽  
V. H. Alkhanov

Conductive anesthesia as a therapeutic agent for injuries and diseases of the lower extremities is rarely performed. This is primarily due to the fact that the posterior approach is mainly used to perform the sciatic nerve block, which requires special positioning of the patient and is not suitable for inserting a catheter. The most convenient in this respect is the front access to the sciatic nerve. We catheterized the sciatic nerve according to V.V. Kuzmenkov et al. The method of long-term conduction block of the sciatic nerve (DPBS) was performed in 23 patients.


2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Barrington ◽  
Su-Ling K. Lai ◽  
Chris A. Briggs ◽  
Jason J. Ivanusic ◽  
Samuel R. Gledhill

2015 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 336-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Saranteas ◽  
F. Zafiropoulou ◽  
G. Kostopanagiotou ◽  
T. Paraskevopoulos

2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluca Cappelleri ◽  
Andrea Luigi Ambrosoli ◽  
Marco Gemma ◽  
Valeria Libera Eva Cedrati ◽  
Federico Bizzarri ◽  
...  

Abstract What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New Background Both extra- and intraneural sciatic injection resulted in significant axonal nerve damage. This study aimed to establish the minimum effective volume of intraneural ropivacaine 1% for complete sensory-motor sciatic nerve block in 90% of patients, and related electrophysiologic variations. Methods Forty-seven consecutive American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II patients received an ultrasound-guided popliteal intraneural nerve block following the up-and-down biased coin design. The starting volume was 15 ml. Baseline, 5-week, and 6-month electrophysiologic tests were performed. Amplitude, latency, and velocity were evaluated. A follow-up telephone call at 6 months was also performed. Results The minimum effective volume of ropivacaine 1% in 90% of patients for complete sensory-motor sciatic nerve block resulted in 6.6 ml (95% CI, 6.4 to 6.7) with an onset time of 19 ± 12 min. Success rate was 98%. Baseline amplitude of action potential (mV) at ankle, fibula, malleolus, and popliteus were 8.4 ± 2.3, 7.1 ± 2.0, 15.4 ± 6.5, and 11.7 ± 5.1 respectively. They were significantly reduced at the fifth week (4.3 ± 2.1, 3.5 ± 1.8, 6.9 ± 3.7, and 5.2 ± 3.0) and at the sixth month (5.9 ± 2.3, 5.1 ± 2.1, 10.3 ± 4.0, and 7.5 ± 2.7) (P < 0.001 in all cases). Latency and velocity did not change from the baseline. No patient reported neurologic symptoms at 6-month follow-up. Conclusions The intraneural ultrasound-guided popliteal local anesthetic injection significantly reduces the local anesthetic dose to achieve an effective sensory-motor block, decreasing the risk of systemic toxicity. Persistent electrophysiologic changes suggest possible axonal damage that will require further investigation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document