Faculty Opinions recommendation of Linear arrays of nuclear envelope proteins harness retrograde actin flow for nuclear movement.

Author(s):  
James Bamburg ◽  
O'Neil Wiggan
Science ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 329 (5994) ◽  
pp. 956-959 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. W. G. Luxton ◽  
E. R. Gomes ◽  
E. S. Folker ◽  
E. Vintinner ◽  
G. G. Gundersen

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (24) ◽  
pp. 3869-3880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wakam Chang ◽  
Eric S. Folker ◽  
Howard J. Worman ◽  
Gregg G. Gundersen

In migrating fibroblasts, rearward movement of the nucleus orients the centrosome toward the leading edge. Nuclear movement results from coupling rearward-moving, dorsal actin cables to the nucleus by linear arrays of nesprin-2G and SUN2, termed transmembrane actin-associated nuclear (TAN) lines. A-type lamins anchor TAN lines, prompting us to test whether emerin, a nuclear membrane protein that interacts with lamins and TAN line proteins, contributes to nuclear movement. In fibroblasts depleted of emerin, nuclei moved nondirectionally or completely failed to move. Consistent with these nuclear movement defects, dorsal actin cable flow was nondirectional in cells lacking emerin. TAN lines formed normally in cells lacking emerin and were coordinated with the erratic nuclear movements, although in 20% of the cases, TAN lines slipped over immobile nuclei. Myosin II drives actin flow, and depletion of myosin IIB, but not myosin IIA, showed similar nondirectional nuclear movement and actin flow as in emerin-depleted cells. Myosin IIB specifically coimmunoprecipitated with emerin, and emerin depletion prevented myosin IIB localization near nuclei. These results show that emerin functions with myosin IIB to polarize actin flow and nuclear movement in fibroblasts, suggesting a novel function for the nuclear envelope in organizing directional actin flow and cytoplasmic polarity.


2018 ◽  
Vol 217 (10) ◽  
pp. 3330-3342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanmay P. Lele ◽  
Richard B. Dickinson ◽  
Gregg G. Gundersen

Positioning and shaping the nucleus represents a mechanical challenge for the migrating cell because of its large size and resistance to deformation. Cells shape and position the nucleus by transmitting forces from the cytoskeleton onto the nuclear surface. This force transfer can occur through specialized linkages between the nuclear envelope and the cytoskeleton. In response, the nucleus can deform and/or it can move. Nuclear movement will occur when there is a net differential in mechanical force across the nucleus, while nuclear deformation will occur when mechanical forces overcome the mechanical resistance of the various structures that comprise the nucleus. In this perspective, we review current literature on the sources and magnitude of cellular forces exerted on the nucleus, the nuclear envelope proteins involved in transferring cellular forces, and the contribution of different nuclear structural components to the mechanical response of the nucleus to these forces.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document