Evaluation of Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions Following Mandibular Setback Surgery in Patients Treated with Surgery First Orthognathic Approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agarwal SS
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Jung-Hsuan Cheng ◽  
Chun-Ming Chen ◽  
Ping-Ho Chen ◽  
Szu-Ting Chou ◽  
Chin-Yun Pan ◽  
...  

Purpose. We investigated the pharyngeal airway dimensions and their correlations in patients who underwent mandibular setback surgery versus those who did not. Materials and Methods. One hundred and sixty cephalometric radiographs (120 patients) were obtained from patients with three skeletal malocclusion classifications: Class I and Class II in the nonsurgery group and Class III in the surgery group (preoperative and postoperative cephalograms). The following dimensions were measured: nasopharyngeal airway (NOP), uvulopharyngeal airway (UOP), shortest distance from the posterior tongue to the pharyngeal wall (TOP), and distance from the epiglottis to the pharyngeal wall (EOP). Paired t test, one-way analysis of variance, and Pearson correlation coefficients were used for statistical analysis. Results. Preoperatively, UOP and TOP of skeletal Class III patients (15.2 mm and 16.6 mm) were significantly larger than those of skeletal Class II (11.5 mm and 12 mm) and Class II (12.3 mm and 12.9 mm) patients, respectively. No differences were observed in EOP between the three skeletal patterns. The hyoid bone of Class III patients was significantly anterior to that of Class I/II patients. Furthermore, UOP had a moderate negative correlation with soft palate length. Postoperatively, no significant difference (UOP, TOP, EOP, soft palate width, and hyoid bone) was found between the skeletal classes. Conclusion. Preoperatively, UOP and TOP of skeletal Class III patients were significantly wider than those of skeletal Class I/II patients. Pre- and postoperatively, EOP did not exhibit significant differences among the three skeletal classifications. No differences were found in all postoperative pharyngeal airway dimensions between Class III patients and nonsurgery patients (Class I and Class II).


2010 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 302-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soonshin Hwang ◽  
Chooryung Judi Chung ◽  
Yoon-Jeong Choi ◽  
Jong-Ki Huh ◽  
Kyung-Ho Kim

2016 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 976-982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darshit H. Shah ◽  
Ki Beom Kim ◽  
Mark W. McQuilling ◽  
Reza Movahed ◽  
Ankit H. Shah ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze and compare pharyngeal airflow characteristics pre- and post–mandibular setback surgery in patients with Class III skeletal dysplasia using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Materials and Methods: Records of 29 patients who had received orthodontic treatment along with mandibular setback surgery were obtained. CBCT scans were obtained at three time points: T1 (before surgery), T2 (average of 6 months after surgery), and T3 (average of 1 year after surgery). Digitized pharyngeal airway models were generated from these scans. CFD was used to simulate and characterize pharyngeal airflow. Results: Mean airway volume was significantly reduced from 35,490.324 mm3 at T1 to 24,387.369 mm3 at T2 and 25,069.459 mm3 at T3. Significant increase in mean negative pressure was noted from 3.110 Pa at T1 to 6.116 Pa at T2 and 6.295 Pa at T3. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between the change in airway volume and the change in pressure drop at both the T2 and T3 time points. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between the amount of mandibular setback and change in pressure drop at the T2 time point. Conclusions: Following mandibular setback surgery, pharyngeal airway volume was decreased and relative mean negative pressure was increased, implying an increased effort required from a patient for maintaining constant pharyngeal airflow. Thus, high-risk patients undergoing a large amount of mandibular setback surgery should be evaluated for obstructive sleep apnea and the proposed treatment plan be revised based on the risk for potential airway compromise.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshito Shirazawa ◽  
Tomonori Iwasaki ◽  
Kazuhiro Ooi ◽  
Yutaka Kobayashi ◽  
Ayaka Yanagisawa‐Minami ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinod Narayanan ◽  
K Murugesan ◽  
RameshV Babu

2005 ◽  
Vol 63 (10) ◽  
pp. 1509-1514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengshan Chen ◽  
Kazuto Terada ◽  
Kooji Hanada ◽  
Isao Saito

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document