The ice shell project

Author(s):  
Anthony Haag ◽  
Oliver Burch ◽  
Damian Ineichen ◽  
Philippe Block ◽  
Francesco Ranaudo
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-12
Author(s):  
Arno Pronk ◽  
Peng Luo ◽  
Qingpeng Li ◽  
Fred Sanders ◽  
Marjolein overtoom ◽  
...  

There has been a long tradition in making ice structures, but the development of technical improvements for making ice buildings is a new field with just a handful of researchers. Most of the projects were realized by professors in cooperation with their students as part of their education in architecture and civil engineering. The following professors have realized ice projects in this setting: Heinz Isler realized some experiments since the 1950s; Tsutomu Kokawa created in the past three decades several ice domes in the north of Japan with a span up to 25 m; Lancelot Coar realized a number of fabric formed ice shell structures including fiberglass bars and hanging fabric as a mold for an ice shell in 2011 and in 2015 he produced an fabric-formed ice origami structure in cooperation with MIT (Caitlin Mueller) and VUB (Lars de Laet). Arno Pronk realized several ice projects such as the 2004 artificially cooled igloo, in 2014 and 2015 dome structures with an inflatable mold in Finland and in 2016–2019, an ice dome, several ice towers and a 3D printed gridshell of ice in Harbin (China) as a cooperation between the Universities of Eindhoven & Leuven (Pronk) and Harbin (Wu and Luo). In cooperation between the University of Alberta and Eindhoven two ice beams were realized during a workshop in 2020. In this paper we will present the motivation and learning experiences of students involved in learning-by-doing by realizing one large project in ice. The 2014–2016 projects were evaluated by Sanders and Overtoom; using questionnaires among the participants by mixed cultural teams under extreme conditions. By comparing the results in different situations and cultures we have found common rules for the success of those kinds of educational projects. In this paper we suggest that the synergy among students participating in one main project without a clear individual goal can be very large. The paper will present the success factors for projects to be perceived as a good learning experience.


Icarus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 364 ◽  
pp. 114466
Author(s):  
Ondřej Čadek ◽  
Klára Kalousová ◽  
Jakub Kvorka ◽  
Christophe Sotin
Keyword(s):  

Icarus ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 114617
Author(s):  
Ross R. Maguire ◽  
Nicholas C. Schmerr ◽  
Vedran Lekic ◽  
Terry A. Hurford ◽  
Lenore Dai ◽  
...  

Astrobiology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 941-954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Běhounková ◽  
Ondřej Souček ◽  
Jaroslav Hron ◽  
Ondřej Čadek

Author(s):  
Alexander Staroselsky ◽  
Ranadip Acharya ◽  
Alexander Khain

AbstractThe drop freezing process is described by a phase-field model. Two cases are considered: when the freezing is triggered by central nucleation and when nucleation occurs on the drop surface. Depending on the environmental temperature and drop size, different morphological structures develop. Detailed dendritic growth was simulated at the first stage of drop freezing. Independent of the nucleation location, a decrease in temperature within the range from ~ −5 to −25°C led to an increase in the number of dendrites and a decrease in their width and the interdendritic space. At temperatures lower than about −25°C, a planar front developed following surface nucleation, while dendrites formed a granular-like structure with small interdendritic distances following bulk nucleation. An ice shell grew in at the same time (but slower) as dendrites following surface nucleation, while it started forming once the dendrites have reached the drop surface in the case of central nucleation. The formed ice morphology at the first freezing stage predefined the splintering probability. We assume that stresses needed to break the ice shell arose from freezing of the water in the interdendritic spaces. Under this assumption, the number of possible splinters/fragments was proportional to the number of dendrites, and the maximum rate of splintering/fragmentation occurred within a temperature range of about −10 °C to −20°C, in agreement with available laboratory and in situ measurements. At temperatures < −25°C, freezing did not lead to the formation of significant stresses, making splintering unlikely. The number of dendrites increased with drop size, causing a corresponding increase in the number of splinters. Examples of morphology that favors drop cracking are presented, and the duration of the freezing stages is evaluated. Sensitivity of the freezing process to the surface fluxes is discussed.


Author(s):  
Dana M. Tobin ◽  
Matthew R. Kumjian

AbstractA unique polarimetric radar signature indicative of hydrometeor refreezing during ice pellet events has been documented in several recent studies, yet the underlying microphysical causes remain unknown. The signature is characterized by enhancements in differential reflectivity (ZDR), specific differential phase (KDP), and linear depolarization ratio (LDR), and a reduction in co-polar correlation coefficient (ρhv) within a layer of decreasing radar reflectivity factor at horizontal polarization (ZH). In previous studies, the leading hypothesis for the observed radar signature is the preferential refreezing of small drops. Here, a simplified, one-dimensional, explicit bin microphysics model is developed to simulate the refreezing of fully melted hydrometeors, and coupled with a polarimetric radar forward operator to quantify the impact of preferential refreezing on simulated radar signatures. The modeling results demonstrate that preferential refreezing is insufficient by itself to produce the observed signatures. In contrast, simulations considering an ice shell growing asymmetrically around a freezing particle (i.e., emulating a thicker ice shell on the bottom of a falling particle) produce realistic ZDR enhancements, and also closely replicate observed features in ZH, KDP, LDR, and ρhv. Simulations that assume no increase in particle wobbling with freezing produce an even greater ZDR enhancement, but this comes at the expense of reducing the LDR enhancement. It is suggested that the polarimetric refreezing signature is instead strongly related to both the distribution of the unfrozen liquid portion within a freezing particle, and the orientation of this liquid with respect to the horizontal.


2020 ◽  
Vol 497 (4) ◽  
pp. 5413-5420
Author(s):  
Eren C S Slate ◽  
Rory Barker ◽  
Ryan T Euesden ◽  
Max R Revels ◽  
Anthony J H M Meijer

ABSTRACT Formation routes, involving closed shell, radical, and charged species for urea, have been studied using computational methods to probe their feasibility in the interstellar medium. All reactions involving closed shell species were found to have prohibitive barriers. The radical–radical reaction possesses a barrier of only 4 kJ mol−1, which could be surmountable. A charged species based route was also investigated. A barrier of only 8 kJ mol−1 was found in that case, when a partial water ice shell was included.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document