scholarly journals Different Types of Attacks on Block Ciphers

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 28-31
Keyword(s):  
Block Cipher ◽  
Classical Method ◽  
System Of Nonlinear Equations ◽  
Algebraic Attack ◽  
Differential Attack ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Important Challenge ◽  
Impossible Differential ◽  
Linear Differential ◽  
Truncated Differential

Cryptanalysis is a very important challenge that faces cryptographers. It has several types that should be well studied by cryptographers to be able to design cryptosystem more secure and able to resist any type of attacks. This paper introduces six types of attacks: Linear, Differential , Linear-Differential, Truncated differential Impossible differential attack and Algebraic attacks. In this paper, algebraic attack is used to formulate the substitution box(S-box) of a block cipher to system of nonlinear equations and solve this system by using a classical method called Grobner  Bases . By Solving these equations, we made algebraic attack on S-box.

scholarly journals Subspace Trail Cryptanalysis and its Applications to AES

2017 ◽  
pp. 192-225
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Grassi ◽  
Christian Rechberger ◽  
Sondre Rønjom
Keyword(s):  
Block Cipher ◽  
Data Complexity ◽  
Secret Key ◽  
Differential Attack ◽  
Key Recovery ◽  
Special Cases ◽  
Impossible Differential ◽  
The One ◽  
Truncated Differential ◽  
Key Recovery Attacks

We introduce subspace trail cryptanalysis, a generalization of invariant subspace cryptanalysis. With this more generic treatment of subspaces we do no longer rely on specific choices of round constants or subkeys, and the resulting method is as such a potentially more powerful attack vector. Interestingly, subspace trail cryptanalysis in fact includes techniques based on impossible or truncated differentials and integrals as special cases. Choosing AES-128 as the perhaps most studied cipher, we describe distinguishers up to 5-round AES with a single unknown key. We report (and practically verify) competitive key-recovery attacks with very low data-complexity on 2, 3 and 4 rounds of AES. Additionally, we consider AES with a secret S-Box and we present a (generic) technique that allows to directly recover the secret key without finding any information about the secret S-Box. This approach allows to use e.g. truncated differential, impossible differential and integral attacks to find the secret key. Moreover, this technique works also for other AES-like constructions, if some very common conditions on the S-Box and on the MixColumns matrix (or its inverse) hold. As a consequence, such attacks allow to better highlight the security impact of linear mappings inside an AES-like block cipher. Finally, we show that our impossible differential attack on 5 rounds of AES with secret S-Box can be turned into a distinguisher for AES in the same setting as the one recently proposed by Sun, Liu, Guo, Qu and Rijmen at CRYPTO 2016

scholarly journals Cryptanalysis of Reduced round SKINNY Block Cipher

2018 ◽  
pp. 124-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadegh Sadeghi ◽  
Tahereh Mohammadi ◽  
Nasour Bagheri
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Integer Linear Programming ◽  
Block Cipher ◽  
Mixed Integer ◽  
Differential Attack ◽  
Key Recovery ◽  
Zero Correlation ◽  
Impossible Differential ◽  
Key Recovery Attack ◽  
Correlation Attacks ◽  
Impossible Differential Cryptanalysis

SKINNY is a family of lightweight tweakable block ciphers designed to have the smallest hardware footprint. In this paper, we present zero-correlation linear approximations and the related-tweakey impossible differential characteristics for different versions of SKINNY .We utilize Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) to search all zero-correlation linear distinguishers for all variants of SKINNY, where the longest distinguisher found reaches 10 rounds. Using a 9-round characteristic, we present 14 and 18-round zero correlation attacks on SKINNY-64-64 and SKINNY- 64-128, respectively. Also, for SKINNY-n-n and SKINNY-n-2n, we construct 13 and 15-round related-tweakey impossible differential characteristics, respectively. Utilizing these characteristics, we propose 23-round related-tweakey impossible differential cryptanalysis by applying the key recovery attack for SKINNY-n-2n and 19-round attack for SKINNY-n-n. To the best of our knowledge, the presented zero-correlation characteristics in this paper are the first attempt to investigate the security of SKINNY against this attack and the results on the related-tweakey impossible differential attack are the best reported ones.

scholarly journals An Improved Truncated Differential Cryptanalysis of Klein

2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-147
Author(s):  
Shahram Rasoolzadeh ◽  
Zahra Ahmadian ◽  
Mahmoud Salmasizadeh ◽  
Mohammad Reza Aref
Keyword(s):  
Block Cipher ◽  
Slight Modification ◽  
Secret Key ◽  
Differential Attack ◽  
Key Recovery ◽  
Recovery Method ◽  
Software And Hardware ◽  
State Size ◽  
Truncated Differential ◽  
Better Than

Abstract KLEIN is a family of lightweight block ciphers which was proposed at RFIDSec 2011 by Gong et. al. It has three versions with 64, 80 or 96-bit key size, all with a 64-bit state size. It uses 16 identical 4-bit S-boxes combined with two AES’s MixColumn transformations for each round. This approach allows compact implementations of KLEIN in both low-end software and hardware. Such an unconventional combination attracts the attention of cryptanalysts, and several security analyses have been published. The most successful one was presented at FSE 2014 which was a truncated differential attack. They could attack up to 12, 13 and 14 rounds out of total number of 12, 16 and 20 rounds for KLEIN-64, -80 and -96, respectively. In this paper, we present improved attacks on three versions of KLEIN block cipher, which recover the full secret key with better time and data complexities for the previously analyzed number of rounds. The improvements also enable us to attack up to 14 and 15 rounds for KLEIN-80 and -96, respectively, which are the highest rounds ever analyzed. Our improvements are twofold: the first, finding two new truncated differential paths with probabilities better than that of the previous ones, and the second, a slight modification in the key recovery method which makes it faster.

On optimal size in truncated differential attacks

2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 246-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas T. Courtois ◽  
Theodosis Mourouzis ◽  
Anna Grocholewska-Czuryło ◽  
Jean-Jacques Quisquater
Keyword(s):  
Block Cipher ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Differential Cryptanalysis ◽  
Optimal Size ◽  
Potential Space ◽  
Differential Attack ◽  
Pass Through ◽  
Differential Attacks ◽  
Differential Properties ◽  
Truncated Differential

Differential Cryptanalysis (DC) is one of the oldest known attacks on block ciphers. DC is based on tracking of changes in the differences between two messages as they pass through the consecutive rounds of encryption. However DC remains very poorly understood. In his textbook written in the late 1990s Schneier wrote that against differential cryptanalysis, GOST is “probably stronger than DES”. In fact Knudsen have soon proposed more powerful advanced differential attacks however the potential space of such attacks is truly immense. To this day there is no method which allows to evaluate the security of a cipher against such attacks in a systematic way. Instead, attacks are designed and improved in ad-hoc ways with heuristics [6–13,21]. The best differential attack known has time complexity of 2179 [13]. In this paper we show that for a given block cipher there exists an optimal size for advanced differential properties. This new understanding allows to considerably reduce the space to be searched for “good” truncated differential properties suitable for an attack.

scholarly journals Clustering Related-Tweak Characteristics: Application to MANTIS-6

2018 ◽  
pp. 111-132
Author(s):  
Maria Eichlseder ◽  
Daniel Kales
Keyword(s):  
Block Cipher ◽  
Differential Cryptanalysis ◽  
Differential Attack ◽  
Key Recovery ◽  
Popular Approach ◽  
Differential Characteristic ◽  
Clustering Approach ◽  
Tweakable Block Cipher ◽  
Key Recovery Attack ◽  
Truncated Differential

The TWEAKEY/STK construction is an increasingly popular approach for designing tweakable block ciphers that notably uses a linear tweakey schedule. Several recent attacks have analyzed the implications of this approach for differential cryptanalysis and other attacks that can take advantage of related tweakeys. We generalize the clustering approach of a recent differential attack on the tweakable block cipher MANTIS5 and describe a tool for efficiently finding and evaluating such clusters. More specifically, we consider the set of all differential characteristics compatible with a given truncated characteristic, tweak difference, and optional constraints for the differential. We refer to this set as a semi-truncated characteristic and estimate its probability by analyzing the distribution of compatible differences at each step. We apply this approach to find a semi-truncated differential characteristic for MANTIS6 with probability about 2−67.73 and derive a key-recovery attack with a complexity of about 255.09 chosen-plaintext queries and 255.52 computations. The data-time product is 2110.61 << 2126.

scholarly journals Accurate Estimate of the Advantage of Impossible Differential Attacks

2017 ◽  
pp. 169-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Céline Blondeau
Keyword(s):  
Time Complexity ◽  
Block Cipher ◽  
Poisson Approximation ◽  
Accurate Estimate ◽  
Random Permutations ◽  
Differential Attack ◽  
Impossible Differential ◽  
Impossible Differential Attack ◽  
Differential Attacks ◽  
Multivariate Hypergeometric Distribution

Impossible differential attacks, which are taking advantage of differentials that cannot occur, are powerful attacks for block cipher primitives. The power of such attacks is often measured in terms of the advantage — number of key-bits found during the key sieving phase — which determines the time complexity of the exhaustive key search phase. The statistical model used to compute this advantage has been introduced in the seminal work about the resistance of the DEAL cipher to impossible differential attacks. This model, which has not been modified since the end of the 1990s, is implicitly based on the Poisson approximation of the binomial distribution. In this paper, we investigate this commonly used model and experimentally illustrate that random permutations do not follow it. Based on this observation, we propose more accurate estimates of the advantage of an impossible differential attack. The experiments illustrate the accuracy of the estimate derived from the multivariate hypergeometric distribution. The maximal advantage –using the full codebook– of an impossible differential attack is also derived.

scholarly journals Using Constraint Programming to solve a Cryptanalytic Problem

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Gerault ◽  
Marine Minier ◽  
Christine Solnon
Keyword(s):  
Constraint Programming ◽  
Block Cipher ◽  
Differential Attack ◽  
Standard Block

We describe Constraint Programming (CP) models to solve a cryptanalytic problem: the chosen key differential attack against the standard block cipher AES. We show that CP solvers are able to solve these problems quicker than dedicated cryptanalysis tools, and we prove that a solution claimed to be optimal in two recent cryptanalysis papers is not optimal by providing a better solution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document