Computer architecture and John von Neumann principles

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-15
Author(s):  
Ramazan Əzizxan oğlu Eyyubov ◽  
◽  
Leyla Elxan qızı Bayramova ◽  
Zeynəb Mirsəməd qızı Sadıqova ◽  
◽  
...  

The program is stored in the machine's memory from any external device. The control device organizes its execution, taking into account the program in memory. The mathematical-logical device performs mathematical and logical calculations in accordance with the entered commands. Thus, the computer performs calculations without human assistance. Key words: computer, software, device, information, scheme

Author(s):  
Thomas Haigh ◽  
Mark Priestley ◽  
Crispin Rope

This chapter charts the rapid evolution of thinking about programming and computer architecture among members of the ENIAC team from 1944 onward, as what is usually called the “stored program concept” was formulated with John von Neumann and presented in the “First Draft of a Report on the EDVAC.” Use of archival sources makes this more specific and rigorous in documenting this process than any previous published account, presenting the new approach as an evolution of, and response to, the original ENIAC programming method. The ideas present in the “First Draft” are clearly explained and separated into three distinct clusters: the “EDVAC hardware paradigm,” the “von Neumann architecture paradigm,” and the “modern code paradigm.” The chapter finishes with an exploration of initial understanding and reception of these ideas, reconstructing the late-1940s consensus on what was important about the new approach and why.


2004 ◽  
Vol 174 (12) ◽  
pp. 1371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail I. Monastyrskii
Keyword(s):  

2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry McMullin

In the late 1940s John von Neumann began to work on what he intended as a comprehensive “theory of [complex] automata.” He started to develop a book length manuscript on the subject in 1952. However, he put it aside in 1953, apparently due to pressure of other work. Due to his tragically early death in 1957, he was never to return to it. The draft manuscript was eventually edited, and combined for publication with some related lecture transcripts, by Burks in 1966. It is clear from the time and effort that von Neumann invested in it that he considered this to be a very significant and substantial piece of work. However, subsequent commentators (beginning even with Burks) have found it surprisingly difficult to articulate this substance. Indeed, it has since been suggested that von Neumann's results in this area either are trivial, or, at the very least, could have been achieved by much simpler means. It is an enigma. In this paper I review the history of this debate (briefly) and then present my own attempt at resolving the issue by focusing on an analysis of von Neumann's problem situation. I claim that this reveals the true depth of von Neumann's achievement and influence on the subsequent development of this field, and further that it generates a whole family of new consequent problems, which can still serve to inform—if not actually define—the field of artificial life for many years to come.


Physics World ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. 59-60i
Author(s):  
Andrew Robinson

Andrew Robinson reviews The Man from the Future: the Visionary Life of John von Neumann by Ananyo Bhattacharya.


2010 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandye Gloria-Palermo

The objective is to interpret John von Neumann's growth model as a decisive step of the forthcoming formalist revolution of the 1950s in economics. This model gave rise to an impressive variety of comments about its classical or neoclassical underpinnings. We go beyond this traditional criterion and interpret rather this model as the manifestation of von Neumann's involvement in the formalist programme of mathematician David Hilbert. We discuss the impact of Kurt G?del's discoveries on this programme. We show that the growth model reflects the pragmatic turn of the formalist programme after G?del and proposes the extension of modern axiomatisation to economics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document