scholarly journals Illusory contours are not caused by simultaneous brightness contrast

1983 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 403-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Prazdny
Perception ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P Frisby ◽  
Jeremy L Clatworthy

It is suggested that simultaneous brightness contrast mediated by lateral inhibition plays an important role in generating many illusory contours. These contours might reflect a further way in which lateral inhibition serves to clarify and sharpen the neural encoding of retinal images.


1974 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 983-II ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Gibbs ◽  
R.B. Lawson

Perception ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 627-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Davi ◽  
Baingio Pinna ◽  
Marco Sambin

An analysis is presented of a phenomenological model of illusory contours. The model is based on amodal completion as the primary factor giving rise to the illusory figure. In the experiment, conducted by the method of paired comparisons, the same parameter was manipulated in two series of equivalent configurations. The first series yielded examples of amodal completion, the second examples of illusory figures. Three groups of subjects evaluated the magnitude of completion, the brightness contrast of the illusory figure, and the contour clarity of the illusory figure. A control experiment was conducted, which demonstrated that in these configurations amodal completion and amodal continuation behave in the same way. Line displacement did not influence the brightness or the contour clarity of the illusory figures, though it influenced the magnitude of amodal completion. These results are in agreement with the energetic model developed by Sambin.


1969 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 543-545
Author(s):  
Willard L. Brigner

Xerography has been suggested as a model of the perceptual processes of the visual system. The adequacy of the model was tested in two areas, simultaneous brightness contrast and geometric illusions. Results fail to support the model.


1959 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathew Alpern ◽  
Herbert David

Using the method of binocular brightness matching, simultaneous brightness contrast effects were measured on two observers. The effects of a given pattern were invariably smaller than the summation of the effects of the pattern's components. This failure of additivity was valid both for patterns with isolated components as well as for those with components exactly contiguous with one another. This failure was more pronounced the farther the inducing patterns were from the test patch. These findings are interpreted as indicating that in the human (just as in the Limulus) eye, the amount of inhibition exerted by a given region on its neighbors depends upon the inhibition exerted against it as well as its excitation state.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document