scholarly journals Conjugate reinforcement of operant responding in infants

1966 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lewis P. Lipsitt ◽  
Linda Johnson Pederson ◽  
Clement A. Delucia
1970 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 787-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph S. Edwards ◽  
Vickie Peek

In conjugate reinforcement the rate of Ss responding directly controls the intensity of a reinforcing event. Four conjugate contingencies were used to evaluate radio listening as a reinforcer for human operant responding. Results from 2 Ss clearly demonstrated that radio listening can be used like other events to reinforce response rates. The method of directly recording the listening response was also sensitive to commercials.


1970 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Mira

Listening, a significant dimension of the behavior of hearing-impaired children, may be measured directly by recording childrens' responses to obtain audio narrations programmed via a conjugate reinforcement system. Twelve hearing-impaired, school-aged children responded in varying ways to the opportunity to listen. Direct and continuous measurement of listening has relevance for evaluation of remediation methods and for discovery of variables potentially related to listening.


2020 ◽  
Vol 171 ◽  
pp. 107189
Author(s):  
Callum M.P. Thomas ◽  
Eric A. Thrailkill ◽  
Mark E. Bouton ◽  
John T. Green

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 668-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily C. Merz ◽  
Laraine McDonough ◽  
Yong Lin Huang ◽  
Sophie Foss ◽  
Elizabeth Werner ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 43 (S) ◽  
pp. S225-S228 ◽  
Author(s):  
BERNARD M. RABIN ◽  
LYNN L. BUHLER ◽  
JAMES A. JOSEPH ◽  
BARBARA SHUKITT-HALE ◽  
DANIEL G. JENKINS

1963 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 531-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Symmes

Two groups of 12 8-wk.-old kittens were tested for the reinforcing effect of illumination change resulting from displacement of a spherical plastic manipulandum. For one group responding turned on a dim light in the darkened test box, and for the other group responding turned the light off. Both groups were given 3 familiarization sessions followed by 8 test sessions in which one of two identical manipulanda affected illumination. The onset group developed a reliable preference for the light change manipulandum, and the light offset group did not.


2010 ◽  
Vol 208 (4) ◽  
pp. 563-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ainhoa Plaza-Zabala ◽  
Xavier Viñals ◽  
Rafael Maldonado ◽  
Patricia Robledo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document