An update of the Benton Facial Recognition Test

Author(s):  
Ebony Murray ◽  
Rachel Bennetts ◽  
Jeremy Tree ◽  
Sarah Bate
Neurology ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 62 (7) ◽  
pp. 1219-1220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley C. Duchaine ◽  
Ken Nakayama

2009 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Tranel ◽  
Eduardo Vianna ◽  
Kenneth Manzel ◽  
Hanna Damasio ◽  
Thomas Grabowski

2013 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 527-529
Author(s):  
Abdulkadir Koçer ◽  
Emel Koçer ◽  
Halit Beşir ◽  
Süber Dikici ◽  
Füsun Domaç ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Rossion ◽  
Caroline Michel

We report normative data from a large (N=307) sample of young adult participants tested with a computerized version of the long form of the classical Benton Facial Recognition Test (BFRT; Benton & Van Allen, 1968). The BFRT-c requires to match a target face photograph to one or three of 6 face photographs simultaneously presented. Percent accuracy at the BFRT-c (81%-83%) is below ceiling yet well above chance level, with little interindividual variance in this typical population sample, as expected from a sensitive clinical test. While split-half reliability on accuracy rates is relatively low due to the large variability in difficulty across items, correct response times (RTs) measured in this version – completed in 3 minutes on average - provide a reliable and critical complementary measure of performance at individual unfamiliar face matching. In line with previous observations from other measures, females outperform male participants at the BFRT-c, especially for female faces. In general, performance is also lower following lighting changes than head rotations, in line with previous studies emphasizing limited ability at matching pictures of unfamiliar faces with important variations in lighting direction. Overall, this normative data set supports the validity of the BFRT-c as a key component of a battery of tests identifying clinical impairments at individual face recognition such as observed in acquired prosopagnosia. However, beyond global indexes of performance based on accuracy rates only, this analysis strongly recommends full consideration of the time taken to match individual faces as well as the variability in performance across items.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ebony Murray ◽  
Rachel Bennetts ◽  
Jeremy Tree ◽  
Sarah Bate

The Benton Facial Recognition Test (BFRT) is a paper-and-pen task that is traditionally used to assess face perception skills in neurological, clinical and psychiatric conditions. Despite criticisms of its stimuli, the task enjoys a simple procedure and is rapid to administer. Further, it has recently been computerised (BFRT-c), allowing reliable measurement of completion times and the need for online testing. Here, in response to calls for repeat-screening for the accurate detection of face processing deficits, we present the BFRT-Revised (BFRT-r): a new version of the BFRT-c that maintains the task’s basic paradigm, but employs new, higher quality stimuli that reflect recent theoretical advances in the field. An initial validation study with typical participants indicated that the BFRT-r has good internal reliability and content validity. A second investigation indicated that while younger and older participants had comparable accuracy, completion times were longer in the latter, highlighting the need for age-matched norms. Administration of the BFRT-r and BFRT-c to 32 individuals with developmental prosopagnosia resulted in improved sensitivity in diagnostic screening for the BFRT-r compared to the BFRT-c. These findings are discussed in relation to current diagnostic screening protocols for face perception deficits. The BFRT-r is stored in an open repository and is freely available to other researchers.


2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 405-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Schretlen ◽  
Godfrey D. Pearlson ◽  
James C. Anthony ◽  
Khara O. Yates

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document