A Study probing the Moderating Effect of Contract Type on the Psychological Contract Fulfillment & Organizational Citizenship Behaviour Alliance amidst the Axis Banks’ representatives

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald G. Gardner ◽  
Jon L. Pierce ◽  
He Peng

PurposeSocial comparison and job-based psychological ownership (JPO) are compared and contrasted as explanations for relationships between organization relational psychological contract fulfillment (ORPCF) and organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs).Design/methodology/approachSurvey data were collected from 241 employees and 82 of their managers at an information services company. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling to test for hypothesized and exploratory indirect relationships.FindingsConsistent results were found for sequential mediation from ORPCF to employee investment of the self into the job, to JPO, to supervisor-rated helping and voice OCBs. Employees' perception of their relational psychological contract fulfillment (social exchange) did not simultaneously mediate the relationships between ORPCF and employees' OCBs.Research limitations/implicationsPsychological ownership presents a complement to social exchange to explain effects of relational psychological contract fulfillment on employee outcomes. Because of the cross-sectional nature of the data conclusions about causality are quite limited.Practical implicationsOrganizations and managers should emphasize that fulfillment of relational psychological contract obligations represent a significant investment in employees, who reciprocate by investing themselves into their work. This in turn bolsters JPO and its positive employee outcomes.Originality/valueThis is the first study to directly compare social exchange and psychological ownership explanations for effects of psychological contract fulfillment on employees.


2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 1001-1015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ifzal Ahmad ◽  
Mueen Aizaz Zafar

Purpose This study aims to investigate the impact of psychological contract fulfillment (PCF; independent) on organizational citizenship behavior (OCB; dependent) with perceived organizational support (POS) playing a partial mediating role. Design/methodology/approach Quantitative methodology has been adopted to achieve the aim of this study, and data were collected via a questionnaire through an employee–supervisor/colleague dyad. Various five- and four-star hotel staff members in Pakistan were the target population, eliciting a recorded sample of 418 employees and 105 supervisors/colleagues. Findings The study revealed that PCF has a positive impact on POS and OCB. The partial mediating role of POS between the dependent and independent variables was also confirmed. Research limitations/implications Among the implications, a novel theoretical underpinning of organizational support theory (OST) was established in psychological contract literature in addition to the social exchange theory (SET). Similarly, the mediating mechanism of POS was also validated, thereby offering an additional extension in psychological contract literature. Among the limitations, the cross-sectional nature of data and testing of a single mediating path between independent and dependent variables can be noted. Originality/value Alternative theoretical underpinning, that is, the usage of OST, the partial mediating role of POS and the study settings, i.e. evidence from the hotel industry from a developing country, are novel contributions of this study.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 172-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine J. Syrek ◽  
Conny H. Antoni

Abstract. The implementation of a new pay system is a balancing act that produces uncertainty and draws employees’ attention to the fulfillment of exchange agreements. Transformational leadership may be essential during these change processes. Based on psychological contract theory, we expected that transformational leadership impacts job satisfaction and affective organizational commitment through the fulfillment of relational psychological contracts, while the fulfillment of transactional psychological contracts may be crucial for employees’ pay and bonus satisfaction. We assessed 143 employees nested within 34 teams before and after (24 months) a pay for performance (pfp) system was introduced. Our results supported the mediation hypotheses considering job and pay satisfaction, but not considering commitment. Unexpectedly, the effect on bonus satisfaction was mediated via relational psychological contracts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document