scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate in nucleoside analogue treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Chen ◽  
Wei Wei ◽  
Li Jin ◽  
Wentao Kuai ◽  
Fei Li ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ezequiel Ridruejo ◽  
Sebastián Marciano ◽  
Omar Galdame ◽  
María V. Reggiardo ◽  
Alberto E. Muñoz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Habip Gedik ◽  
Muge Sonmezisik

Abstract We report two treatment-naïve cases, a 26-year-old female patient and a 59-year-old male patient who were followed up for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) at the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology. A partial response subsequent to 12 months of Tenofovir Disoproksil (TDF) monotherapy presumably due to an antiviral-drug resistance was noted. A sustained viral response with TDF (245 mg) or Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF, 25 mg) + Entecavir (ETV, 1 mg) combination therapy was observed after failure with TDF monotherapy. A combination therapy with TDF (245 mg) or TAF (25 mg) +ETV (1 mg) is efficacious in naïve patients with a partial response to TDF monotherapy. Keywords: Chronic hepatitis B, Tenofovir, partial response, Entecavir, combination therapy


2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 535-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Buti ◽  
Rosa Maria Morillas ◽  
Martín Prieto ◽  
Moisés Diago ◽  
Juan Pérez ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 14-16
Author(s):  
Navneet Kumar Dubey ◽  
Ganesh Narayan Jha ◽  
Debarshi Jana

Aims:The Aim of study is to compare the efcacy of entecavir with tenofovir alafenamide in treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B patients. Materials and methods: It is a prospective cohort study to compare efcacy of ENTECAVIR and TAF in treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B. Study location was Out Patient Department(OPD), In Patient Department(IPD) and Medical Intensive care unit (MICU) of Dept. of Medicine of DMCH, Laheriasarai. Study duration was 12 months and total 50 individual was in this study. Result: 12% patients of Entecavir and 16% patients of TAF group were presented with HTN; while DM was observed in 4% patients of Entecavir and 8% patients of TAF group. Regarding co-morbidities we found no signicant difference between two groups (p value = >0.05). Hepatitis B virus DNAin the HBeAg positive group was approximately 2 log10 IU/mLhigher than in the HBeAg-negative group. Conclusion: Treatment with antiviral therapy, ETV or TAF, showed potent antiviral activity against HBV and the efcacy of both drugs was comparable.TAF and ETVshowed comparable efcacy and safety in treatment-naïve CHB patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document