scholarly journals Histological complete response in a patient with advanced biliary tract cancer treated by gemcitabine/cisplatin/S-1 combination chemotherapy: A case report

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 757-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tokuhiro Matsubara ◽  
Tsutomu Nishida ◽  
Yoshito Tomimaru ◽  
Masashi Yamamoto ◽  
Shiro Hayashi ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 1429-1434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Kanai ◽  
Kenichi Yoshimura ◽  
Takehiko Tsumura ◽  
Masanori Asada ◽  
Chihiro Suzuki ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 594-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junho Kang ◽  
Jae Ho Jeong ◽  
Hee-Sang Hwang ◽  
Sang Soo Lee ◽  
Do Hyun Park ◽  
...  

Purpose The current standard chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) has limited benefit, and novel therapies need to be investigated. Materials and MethodsIn this prospective cohort study, programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)–positive BTC patients who progressed on first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin were enrolled. Pembrolizumab 200 mg was administered intravenously every 3 weeks. ResultsBetween May 2018 and February 2019, 40 patients were enrolled. Pembrolizumab was given as second-line (47.5%) or ≥ third-line therapy (52.5%). The objective response rate was 10% and 12.5% by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) v1.1 and immune- modified RECIST (imRECIST) and median duration of response was 6.3 months. Among patients with progressive disease as best response, one patient (1/20, 5.0%) achieved complete response subsequently. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 1.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0 to 3.0) and 4.3 months (95% CI, 3.5 to 5.1), respectively, and objective response per imRECIST was significantly associated with PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p=0.001). Tumor proportion score ≥ 50% was significantly associated with higher response rates including the response after pseudoprogression (vs. < 50%; 37.5% vs. 6.5%; p=0.049). Conclusion Pembrolizumab showed modest anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated PD-L1–positive BTC patients. In patients who showed objective response, durable response could be achieved.


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. xi162
Author(s):  
Y. Shibata ◽  
H. Kotani ◽  
K. Ogawa ◽  
M. Takahashi ◽  
M. Takase ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 331-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Sasaki ◽  
Hiroyuki Isayama ◽  
Yukiko Ito ◽  
Ichiro Yasuda ◽  
Nobuo Toda ◽  
...  

331 Background: We previously conducted two prospective studies (phase II study and randomized phase II study) of gemcitabine (GEM) and S-1 combination chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to clarify the difference of treatment outcomes between unresectable and recurrent cases receiving GEM/S-1 combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Methods: The data of two prospective studies were combined for the analysis. In these studies, GEM was administered intravenously at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 over 30 min on days 1 and 15, repeated every four weeks. S-1 was administered orally at a dose of 40 mg/m2 b.i.d. on days 1-14. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles using RECIST version 1.0. The treatment was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal occurred. Results: Fifty-five unresectable cases and ten recurrent cases were enrolled in this analysis. Patient characteristics were similar between each group except the baseline sum of longest diameter, which was used as a measurement of tumor volume (unresectable 9.0 cm vs recurrent 2.8 cm). Response rates of unresectable and recurrent cases were 25.5% and 40.0%, respectively. Dose intensities of each group were statistically different (gemcitabine 96.8% vs 83.5%, p=0.03; S-1 91.8% vs 75.9%, p=0.03). The median time-to-progressions of unresectable and recurrent cases were 5.7 months and 8.7 months, respectively (p=0.14). The overall survivals of each group were 9.6 months and 16.1 months (p=0.10). Conclusions: In recurrent cases, tumor volume was smaller and dose intensity was lower than that of unresectable cases. Recurrent cases showed better treatment outcome comparing to unresectable cases. Therefore, unresectable and recurrent cases should be analyzed separately in the future study.


2015 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 711-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyeong Su Kim ◽  
Ho Young Kim ◽  
Dae Young Zang ◽  
Ho Suk Oh ◽  
Jang Yong Jeon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document