Bank Deregulation, Consolidation and Stability: Evidence on U.S. M&A Centric Activity

Finance ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Saqib Aziz ◽  
Jean-Jacques Lilti
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viet Anh Dang ◽  
Edward Lee ◽  
Yangke Liu ◽  
Cheng Zeng

Author(s):  
S.Carbó Valverde ◽  
David B. Humphrey ◽  
F.Rodrı́guez Fernández

Author(s):  
Allen N. Berger ◽  
Ruiyuan Chen ◽  
Sadok El Ghoul ◽  
Omrane Guedhami
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 101520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianjiao Jiang ◽  
Ross Levine ◽  
Chen Lin ◽  
Lai Wei

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 62-63
Author(s):  
Geoffrey E. Wood

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1684
Author(s):  
Eric C. Davis ◽  
Ani L. Katchova

Previous research on bank deregulation has supported the idea that interstate banking deregulation lowered the cost of credit and increased the net farm income. This analysis builds on that base by investigating whether the agricultural loan delinquency volume was also affected. Using a panel data fixed effects approach, deregulation was found to be associated with changes in the volume of delinquencies: interstate banking deregulation reduced the volume of production loan delinquencies, and de novo branching deregulation increased both production and real-estate loan delinquencies. Thus, deregulation’s outcome is not clear cut: interstate banking reduced farm financial stress but de novo deregulation increased it.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document