AO Tubular External Fixation vs. Unreamed Intramedullary Nailing in Open Grade IIIA-IIIB Tibial Shaft Fractures: A Single-center Randomized Clinical Trial

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 490-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Ali Mohseni ◽  
Jafar Soleimanpo ◽  
Hossein Mohammadpo ◽  
Abolfazal Shahsavari
2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohit Bhandari ◽  
Michael Zlowodzki ◽  
Paul Tornetta ◽  
Andrew Schmidt ◽  
David C. Templeman

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. Popkov ◽  
N. A. Kononovich ◽  
E. N. Gorbach ◽  
S. I. Tverdokhlebov ◽  
Y. M. Irianov ◽  
...  

Purpose. Our research was aimed at studying the radiographic and histological outcomes of using flexible intramedullary nailing (FIN) combined with Ilizarov external fixation (IEF) versus Ilizarov external fixation alone on a canine model of an open tibial shaft fracture.Materials and Methods. Transverse diaphyseal tibial fractures were modelled in twenty dogs. Fractures in the dogs of group 1 (n=10) were stabilized with the Ilizarov apparatus while it was combined with FIN in group 2 (n=10).Results. On day 14, a bone tissue envelope started developing round the FIN wires. Histologically, we revealed only endosteal bone union in group 1 while in group 2 the radiographs revealed complete bone union on day 28. At the same time-point, the areas of cancellous and mature lamellar bone tissues were observed in the intermediary area in group 2. The periosteal layers were formed of the trabeculae net of lamellar structure and united the bone fragments. The frame was removed at 30 days after the fracture in group 2 and after 45 days in group 1 according to bone regeneration.Conclusion. The combination of the Ilizarov apparatus and FIN accelerates bone repair and augments stabilization of tibial shaft fractures as compared with the use of the Ilizarov fixation alone.


2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. E371-E376
Author(s):  
Marc Swiontkowski ◽  
David Teague ◽  
Sheila Sprague ◽  
Sofia Bzovsky ◽  
Diane Heels-Ansdell ◽  
...  

Background: Tibial shaft fractures are the most common long-bone injury, with a reported annual incidence of more than 75 000 in the United States. This study aimed to determine whether patients with tibial fractures managed with intramedullary nails experience a lower rate of reoperation if treated at higher-volume hospitals, or by higher-volume or more experienced surgeons. Methods: The Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Patients with Tibial Fractures (SPRINT) was a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing reamed and nonreamed intramedullary nailing on rates of reoperation to promote fracture union, treat infection or preserve the limb in patients with open and closed fractures of the tibial shaft. Using data from SPRINT, we quantified centre and surgeon volumes into quintiles. We performed analyses adjusted for type of fracture (open v. closed), type of injury (isolated v. multitrauma), gender and age for the primary outcome of reoperation using multivariable logistic regression. Results: There were no significant differences in the odds of reoperation between high- and low-volume centres (p = 0.9). Overall, surgeon volume significantly affected the odds of reoperation (p = 0.03). The odds of reoperation among patients treated by moderate-volume surgeons were 50% less than those among patients treated by verylow-volume surgeons (odds ratio [OR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28–0.88), and the odds of reoperation among patients treated by high-volume surgeons were 47% less than those among patients treated by very-low-volume surgeons (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30–0.93). Conclusion: There appears to be no significant additional patient benefit in treatment by a higher-volume centre for intramedullary fixation of tibial shaft fractures. Additional research on the effects of surgical and clinical site volume in tibial shaft fracture management is needed to confirm this finding. The odds of reoperation were higher in patients treated by very-low-volume surgeons; this finding may be used to optimize the results of tibial shaft fracture management. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00038129


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document