Triplane Fracture of the Distal Tibial Epiphysis

Orthopedics ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-90
Author(s):  
Michael Goodwin ◽  
Robert D D'Ambrosia
2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 823-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masayasu Takahashi ◽  
Hiroyuki Fujioka ◽  
Masaya Tsunoda ◽  
Yasuo Onishi ◽  
Toshihiko Harada ◽  
...  

Injury ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 393-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
John G.M. Tinnemans ◽  
Rene S.V.M. Severijnen

Author(s):  
Lei Cao ◽  
Shu-Man Han ◽  
Hui-Zhao Wu ◽  
Jin-Xu Wen ◽  
Zhe Guo ◽  
...  

Background: The clinical and imaging features of lower tibial shaft spiral fracture, concurrent with distal tibial triplane fracture, are not clear. Introduction: Consequently, this study was aimed to investigate these features for correct diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of possible premature physeal arrest or angular deformation. Method: Patients with lower tibial shaft spiral fracture concurrent with distal tibial triplane fracture were enrolled, and the clinical, imaging, treatment, and follow-up data were analyzed. Result: Five patients with lower tibial shaft spiral fracture concurrent with distal tibial triplane fracture were found, including four men and one woman with an age range of 12-15 years (mean 13.6). Injury to the distal tibial epiphysis was missed in the diagnosis in plain radiography reports, but careful reevaluation confirmed distal tibial epiphysis fracture in four cases, including Salter-Harris type II in three cases and type III in one case. The remaining case had no apparent distal tibial epiphysis injury in the plain radiograph. CT scan revealed that all five patients had distal tibial triplane fracture of the lateral type, including two fragments in three cases and three fragments in two cases. The fracture was divided into type I(within the articular weight-bearing line) in three cases, type II (outside the articular weight-bearing line) in two cases that were based on the involvement of the articular surface by the fracture line. For the lower tibial fracture, one patient was treated with closed reduction and fixation with an elastic nail, three patients had internal plate fixation, and the remaining patient had cast immobilization. Having followed up for 3-11 months (mean 7), all the distal tibial fractures and the triplane fractures were healed without varus or valgus deformity in the ankle. Conclusion : Distal tibial triplane fracture can be readily missed in plain radiography and should be suspected in patients with distal tibial spiral fracture, which should be evaluated with a computed tomographic scan.


Radiology ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 153 (3) ◽  
pp. 763-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
R O Cone ◽  
V Nguyen ◽  
J G Flournoy ◽  
J Guerra

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 479-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Feldman ◽  
Norman Y. Otsuka ◽  
Douglas M. Hedden

1995 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 870
Author(s):  
Jin Hwan An ◽  
Jae Keun So ◽  
Jae Chul Ok

1988 ◽  
Vol 70 (7) ◽  
pp. 967-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
J P Ertl ◽  
R L Barrack ◽  
A H Alexander ◽  
K VanBuecken

1947 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 631-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Nelson ◽  
E. Sulon ◽  
H. Becks ◽  
H. M. Evans

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Michel Laffosse ◽  
Pascal Cariven ◽  
Franck Accadbled ◽  
Serge Bone ◽  
Mohamed-Ali Chaffai

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document