Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures in Children

Orthopedics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. e874-e879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guang-rong Yu ◽  
Hong-mou Zhao ◽  
Yun-feng Yang ◽  
Jia-qian Zhou ◽  
Hai-feng Li
2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-7
Author(s):  
Selene G Parekh ◽  
Todd Bertrand ◽  
Robert Zura ◽  
Samuel Adams ◽  
Alan Yan

ABSTRACT Calcaneal tuberosity fractures comprise only 1 to 2% of all calcaneal fractures. Treatment of these injuries has traditionally included open reduction and internal fixation with various means including lag screws, suture anchors and K-wires. We report on a series of cases treated with excision of the tuberosity fragment with repair of the Achilles tendon supplemented by a flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer. Parekh S, Bertrand T, Zura R, Adams S, Yan A. Novel Techniques in Treating Calcaneal Tuberosity Fractures. The Duke Orthop J 2014;4(1):3-7.


2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 590-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B. Wiley ◽  
Jon D. Norberg ◽  
Christopher J. Klonk ◽  
Ian J. Alexander

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne K. Bremer ◽  
Lukas Kraler ◽  
Lars Frauchiger ◽  
Fabian G. Krause ◽  
Martin Weber

Background: The treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures remains a challenge and the optimal approach is still controversial. The main reason to avoid the extended lateral approach is the high complication rate due to wound healing problems. We report on 16 years of experience with a standardized limited open reduction and internal fixation technique. Methods: Between 2001 and 2017, we prospectively followed 240 consecutive patients operatively treated for a displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture. Patients with open, multiple, bilateral, extra-articular, and Sanders IV fractures and those lost to follow-up were excluded. A lateral subtalar approach was used, with a cast for 8 weeks and full weightbearing allowed after 12 weeks. Follow-up examinations were scheduled until 24 months. Subjective and clinical assessment included gait abnormality, subtalar and ankle range of motion, and stability and alignment. The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score was calculated. Alignment was analyzed on standard radiographs. In total, 131 patients were excluded. The remaining 109 patients were followed for a minimum of 24 months (34.4 ± 14.2 [range, 24-102] months). Results: The mean AOFAS score was 87 ± 13 (range, 32-100). “Excellent” and “good” results, as well as hindfoot motion with “normal/mild” and “moderate” restrictions, were seen in 80% of patients. Early reoperations were performed for insufficient reduction (2 patients), delayed wound healing (debridement, 3 patients), and hematoma (1 patient). Late revisions were arthrodesis (3 patients), medializing calcaneal osteotomy (1 patient), and implant removal (53 patients; 49%). Conclusion: The presented approach has remained unmodified for 16 years and resulted in consistently good functional results. The main disadvantage was the high rate of heel screw removal. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document