Lateral Conductivity Variations within Austria and Its Surroundings by Extrapolating Airborne Electromagnetic Data

Author(s):  
I. Schattauer ◽  
A. Römer ◽  
R.L. Bailey ◽  
R. Leonhardt ◽  
K. Motschka ◽  
...  
Geophysics ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. K25-K36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. McMillan ◽  
Christoph Schwarzbach ◽  
Eldad Haber ◽  
Douglas W. Oldenburg

Geophysics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 492-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Reid ◽  
James C. Macnae

When a confined conductive target embedded in a conductive host is energized by an electromagnetic (EM) source, current flow in the target comes from both direct induction of vortex currents and current channeling. At the resistive limit, a modified magnetometric resistivity integral equation method can be used to rapidly model the current channeling component of the response of a thin-plate target energized by an airborne EM transmitter. For towed-bird transmitter–receiver geometries, the airborne EM anomalies of near-surface, weakly conductive features of large strike extent may be almost entirely attributable to current channeling. However, many targets in contact with a conductive host respond both inductively and galvanically to an airborne EM system. In such cases, the total resistive-limit response of the target is complicated and is not the superposition of the purely inductive and purely galvanic resistive-limit profiles. Numerical model experiments demonstrate that while current channeling increases the width of the resistive-limit airborne EM anomaly of a wide horizontal plate target, it does not necessarily increase the peak anomaly amplitude.


2003 ◽  
Vol 2003 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
J. E. Reid ◽  
P. Fullagar ◽  
J. R. Bishop ◽  
A. D. Fitzpatrick ◽  
R. Richardson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 600-608
Author(s):  
Kaiguang Zhu ◽  
Qiong Zhang ◽  
Cong Peng ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Yiming Lu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document