The Vascular System

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 34-42
Author(s):  
Pranab Chatterjee ◽  
Anjan Kumar Das ◽  
Carmel Martin ◽  
Asok Basu ◽  
Rakesh Biswas

The motivation for this paper is based on the assumption that certain patient and health professional users' experiences can serve as a mirror or a model, whether positive or negative, for other patients and health professional users/learners. This narrative presents a patient's experience of his complicated and ad hoc journey through the diagnoses and treatment of his vascular system disorder. It then tries to connect this with health professional opinions and other patient experiences toward the collective goal of ‘getting a proper diagnosis and management of vascular disease.' Interspersed are professional narratives in the form of clinical evidence and expert comments towards clinical problem solving around vascular system disorders. User-driven health care implies shared decision making based upon collaborative partnerships between patients and health professionals. This narrative indicates that power imbalances in knowledge, particularly when the patient is ill and vulnerable, can lead to inappropriate and even harmful treatments, when profit appears to be the main driver of the medical industrial complex.

Neurosurgery ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 1330-1339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan J. Ranalli ◽  
David G. Kline ◽  
Michael L. McGarvey ◽  
Nicholas M. Boulis ◽  
Eric L. Zager

1991 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-192
Author(s):  
J.P. Kassirer ◽  
R.I. Kopelman

1990 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 415-420
Author(s):  
J.P. Kassirer ◽  
R.I. Kopelman

1989 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 414-418
Author(s):  
Jerome P. Kassirer ◽  
Richard I. Kopelman

2022 ◽  
pp. 194187442110567
Author(s):  
Naomi Niznick ◽  
Ronda Lun ◽  
Daniel A. Lelli ◽  
Tadeu A. Fantaneanu

We present a clinical reasoning case of 42-year-old male with a history of type 1 diabetes who presented to hospital with decreased level of consciousness. We review the approach to coma including initial approach to differential diagnosis and investigations. After refining the diagnostic options based on initial investigations, we review the clinical decision-making process with a focus on narrowing the differential diagnosis, further investigations, and treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document