Cardiac Index Based on Measurements Obtained in a Bedside Chair and in Bed

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 210-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl Rader ◽  
Melissa Nelson ◽  
Cindy Sobek ◽  
Michelle Smith ◽  
Rose Garcia ◽  
...  

Background Accurate measurements for determining cardiac index can be obtained while patients are supine in bed at various backrest elevations. It is not clear if these measurements are accurate when patients are in a bedside chair. Objective To determine if cardiac index based on measurements obtained with the patient in a chair is similar to cardiac index based on measurements obtained with the patient in bed. Methods A convenience sample of cardiac surgical patients and a method-comparison design were used to compare cardiac index values based on measurements obtained with patients in 2 different positions: in a chair and in the bed. A standard thermodilution technique was used to measure cardiac output. Measurement of cardiac output in the second position was obtained immediately after measurement in the first position. Positions were randomly assigned. Bias and precision were calculated and graphed with the Bland-Altman method. Differences in cardiac index of 0.50 or more were considered clinically significant. Analysis of variance was used to determine differences between cardiac index values for the 2 positions. Results A total of 27 postoperative cardiac surgical patients were studied. Cardiac index values based on measurements obtained with patients in the 2 different positions did not differ significantly (F1,50 = 0.446; P = .51). The mean difference score (bias) between the 2 positions was −0.07 (precision, 0.30) Conclusions The practice of putting cardiac surgical patients whose hemodynamic status is stable back to bed before obtaining measurements for calculation of cardiac index may not be required for accurate values.

1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 436-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Kiely ◽  
LA Byers ◽  
R Greenwood ◽  
E Carroll ◽  
D Carroll

BACKGROUND: Measurements of cardiac output with the thermodilution technique add to data for clinical decision making and therefore must be valid and reliable. However, the results of studies on the accuracy of values obtained with room-temperature and iced injectates, especially in patients with high or low cardiac output, have been conflicting. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of the temperature of the injectate (iced or room temperature) on cardiac output values obtained with the thermodilution technique in critically ill adults with known low cardiac output. METHODS: A convenience sample of 50 subjects (41 men and 9 women) who had a cardiac index of less than 2.5 (calculated as cardiac output in liters per minute divided by body surface area in square meters) before the study had cardiac output measured by using a closed system and manual injections of room-temperature and iced injectates. RESULTS: A paired t test indicated no significant difference between iced and room-temperature injectates for cardiac output (iced, 3.62 L/min; room temperature, 3.71 L/min; t = 0.99; P = .327) and cardiac index (iced, 1.95; room temperature, 1.99; t = 0.71; P = .482). CONCLUSION: The findings support the practice of using room-temperature injectate to measure cardiac output in patients with low cardiac output.


2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elissa Walsh ◽  
Sheila Adams ◽  
Janine Chernipeski ◽  
Jenny Cloud ◽  
Elizabeth Gillies ◽  
...  

Background Few data are available on the accuracy of thermodilution measurements of cardiac index with room-temperature injectates and a closed delivery system in patients with low cardiac indexes and/or hypothermic body temperatures. Objective To compare iced and room-temperature injectates for thermodilution measurement of cardiac index in postoperative cardiac surgical patients during hypothermia and normothermia. Methods In a convenience sample of cardiac surgical patients in a cardiac recovery unit, cardiac index was measured with both room-temperature and iced injectates during hypothermia (≤36.0°C) and normothermia (≥36.1°C and ≤38.0°C). Device bias and precision were calculated and graphed by using the Bland-Altman method. A Student t test was used to determine differences between cardiac indexes by injectate temperature. Results A total of 38 patients were studied. Mean bias and precision for room-temperature and iced injectates in all patients were 0.11 (SD, 0.27) during hypothermia and −0.03 (SD, 0.21) during normothermia. In hypothermic patients, cardiac index differed significantly between room-temperature and iced injectates (t1,37 = 2.41, P = .02). Cardiac index measurements did not differ between room-temperature and iced injectates in normothermic patients (P = .33). Conclusions Although significant differences in thermodilution cardiac index were found between room-temperature and iced injectates during hypothermic body temperatures, these differences were small (mean, <0.11). These findings add to the results of the few studies on accuracy of room-temperature injectates for thermodilution measurement of cardiac index.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document