Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Humeral Head Fracture with Massive Rotator Cuff Tear in Elderly Patient

2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oh Soo Kwon ◽  
Chang Yoon Moon ◽  
Weon Yoo Kim
2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1698-1706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert U. Hartzler ◽  
Brandon M. Steen ◽  
Michael M. Hussey ◽  
Michael C. Cusick ◽  
Benjamin J. Cottrell ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. e233
Author(s):  
Robert U. Hartzler ◽  
Brandon Steen ◽  
Michael M. Hussey ◽  
Michael Cusick ◽  
Benjamin J. Cottrell ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paraskevas Georgoulas ◽  
Aliki Fiska ◽  
Athanasios Ververidis ◽  
Georgios I. Drosos ◽  
Evanthia Perikleous ◽  
...  

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has become an optimal treatment for numerous orthopedic entities, such as rotator cuff tear arthropathies, pseudoparalysis, fracture sequelae, acute fractures, failed arthroplasties, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis, and is linked with relief of topical pain and regaining of functionality. Presently, RSA has been conducted through anterosuperior (AS) or deltopectoral (DP) approach. The aim of the study was to discuss both approaches and to examine broadly their features to render a comparison in terms of clinical effectiveness. An electronic search in PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases was performed, using combinations of the following keywords: RSA, DP approach, AS approach, notching, and cuff tear arthropathy. A total of 61 studies were found, and 16 relevant articles were eventually included. Currently published literature has not shown significant diversities in the clinical course due to approach preference; risk of instability seems to be greater in DP approach, while regarding scapular notching and fracture rates the findings were conflicted. In addition, the AS approach has been associated with decreased risk of acromial and scapular spine fractures. In conclusion, both surgical approaches have shown similar clinical outcomes and effectiveness concerning pain and restoring range of motion (ROM) in rotator cuff tear arthropathies. In the future, further investigations based on large-scale well-designed studies are required to address clinical gaps allowing in-depth comparison of both approaches.


2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Young Jeong ◽  
Hong Eun Cha

In the patients of retracted massive rotator cuff tears, there are much of difficulty to functional recovery and pain relief. Nevertheless the development of treatment, there are still debates of the best treatments in the massive rotator cuff tears. Recenlty various of treatments are introduced; these are acromioplasty with debridement, biceps tenotomy, great tuberoplasty with biceps tenotomy, partial repair, mini-open rotator cuff repair, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, soft tissue augmentation, tendon transfer, flap, hemiarthroplasty, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. That there is no difference of result for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty between patients who have massive rotator cuff tear without arthritis and patients who have cuff tear arthropathy. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is one of reliable and successful treatment options for massive rotator cuff tear. Especially it is more effective for patients who have a pseudoparalysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document