scholarly journals A portable inhalational induction device provides co-operative induction of anaesthesia in preanaesthetic area for children

2010 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 521
Author(s):  
Mi-Ja Yun ◽  
Hyo-Seok Na ◽  
Young Duck Shin ◽  
Jun-Sung Han ◽  
Jung-Won Hwang ◽  
...  
Anaesthesia ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 1015-1015
Author(s):  
A. Banerjee ◽  
A. Baranowski

1992 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 242-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Vernon van Heerden ◽  
Mark Bukofzer ◽  
K. Roger Edge ◽  
David F. Morrell

Anaesthesia ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. J. Rowbottom ◽  
H. Yukioka ◽  
M. Fujimori

1998 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
DINESH CHOUDHRY ◽  
STEPHEN STAYER ◽  
ROY SCHWARTZ ◽  
CAROLINE PASQUARIELLO

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Younas M ◽  
Ashraf Zia ◽  
Tahir Ch ◽  
Riaz Hussain ◽  
Tafoorul Islam Galani

Objective: To study the change in O2 saturation during induction of anaesthesia in children. A comparison between Halothane and Isoflurane. Study design: Prospective comparative study. Place and duration of study: Department of anaesthesia Services Hospital Lahore. Patient and methods: This study was conducted in 2004 on 70 children irrespective of sex age range 1-10 year. Results: A total 70 children were studied 35 in each group. The result showed that halothane is a better inhalational induction agent then isoflurane. Conclusion: Halothane is better than isoflurane for inhalational induction in children.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document