scholarly journals The fallacy of comparing diagnostic radiation with background radiation; and the need to learn from past mistakes

2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 71
Author(s):  
D J Emby

The subject of radiation exposure for diagnostic purposes is currently a ‘hot’ topic, and it is appropriate that the debate around this issue is given exposure in the pages of the SAJR. I would like to comment on a few of the points raised by Dr Tipler in his article that appeared in the June 2010 SAJR.

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akingboye M. Dauda ◽  
John O. Ozoh ◽  
Olakunle A. Towobola

Background: Diagnostic investigations using radiation have become a critical feature of medical practice in recent times. However, the possibility of doctors’ underestimation of risks of over-exposure of patients to diagnostic radiation still warrants further evaluation.Objectives: To investigate doctors’ awareness of diagnostic radiation exposure at Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital, South Africa.Methods: This was a cross-sectional, analytical investigation of the awareness of doctors about radiation exposure in diagnostic radiology investigations. A cluster sampling technique was employed to recruit 217 participants. Consent and approval of the participants were sought and obtained before questionnaire administration during departmental meetings between October 2017 and March 2018.Results: Of the participants, 80% had no formal training on radiation exposure and 33.8% of them correctly estimated natural background radiation. Correct estimates of the effective dose from a single-view abdominal X-ray (AXR) were expressed by 7.5%, quantity of radiation of a single-phase computed tomography (CT) abdomen by 30.3% and dosage from a two-view unilateral mammogram by 29.1% of the participants. More than 75% of participants agreed that children are more sensitive to radiation, but only 10.5% suggested medical termination of pregnancy for a woman who had CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast. Dosage and risk of inducing fatal cancer from common but more complex imaging procedures were poorly understood. Only the doctors of the radiology department showed a statistically significant (p < 0.0001) association with regards to their radiation awareness.Conclusion: Because of the high rate of poor awareness of radiation risks observed in this study, it is important to initiate, early in the medical curriculum for medical students, the need for a rotation in the Department of Radiology, similar to such rotations in other medical specialties.


2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. e11
Author(s):  
A. Desmond ◽  
K. O'Regan ◽  
C. Curran ◽  
C. Brennan ◽  
D. O'Driscoll ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 61 (7) ◽  
pp. 1322-1324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney L. Vetter ◽  
George R. Buchanan ◽  
Charles T. Quinn

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document