Comparison of safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus propofol sedation for elective awake fiber-optic intubation

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
TridipJyoti Borah ◽  
Samarjit Dey ◽  
Jaideep Sonowal ◽  
Debasis Pradhan ◽  
Md. Yunus ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (04) ◽  
pp. E625-E629
Author(s):  
Janaki Patel ◽  
John Fang ◽  
Linda Taylor ◽  
Douglas Adler ◽  
Andrew Gawron

Abstract Background and study aims Propofol sedation is an increasingly popular method of sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. The safety and efficacy of the non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol (NAAP) sedation has been demonstrated in the ambulatory setting. However, NAAP sedation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients has not been reported. The purpose of this study is to determine safety and efficacy of NAAP sedation in an ICU population. Methods We retrospectively reviewed esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGD) performed with NAAP sedation in our intensive care units from June 2014 to September 2016. All EGDs were performed for evaluation of gastrointestinal bleeding. The primary end point of this study was to analyze the incidence of sedation-related adverse events (AEs). The secondary end points included successful completion of procedure and any endoscopic interventions performed. Results Two of 161 procedures (1.2 %) had sedation-related AEs requiring procedure termination. One hundred forty-six of 161 procedures (90.7 %) were successfully completed. Incomplete procedures were due to excess heme, retained food or obstructive lesions (13/161, 8.1 %). Endoscopic intervention was performed successfully in 17/24 cases (70.8 %) that had endoscopically treated lesions identified. One hundred six of 161 patients (66 %) were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification III or IV. Conclusion Our retrospective analysis demonstrated that EGDs can be successfully completed in ICU patients using NAAP sedation. When procedures cannot be completed, it is rarely due to sedation-related AEs. NAAP sedation further allows adequate examination and successful treatment of high-risk lesions. NAAP sedation appears safe and effective for endoscopic procedures in the ICU setting.


2017 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 1190-1199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Jerath ◽  
Jonathan Panckhurst ◽  
Matteo Parotto ◽  
Nicholas Lightfoot ◽  
Marcin Wasowicz ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davinder Garewal ◽  
Pallavi Waikar

Propofol sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures is a popular current technique that has generated controversy in the medical field. Worldwide, both anesthetic and nonanesthetic personnel administer this form of sedation. Although the American and Canadian societies of gastroenterologists have endorsed the administration of propofol by nonanesthesia personnel, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not licensed its use in this manner. There is some evidence for the safe use of propofol by nonanesthetic personnel in patients undergoing endoscopy procedures, but there are few randomized trials addressing the safety and efficacy of propofol in patients undergoing ERCP procedures. A serious possible consequence of propofol sedation in patients is that it may result in rapid and unpredictable progression from deep sedation to general anesthesia, and skilled airway support may be required as a rescue measure. Potential complications following deep propofol sedation include hypoxemia and hypotension. Propofol sedation for ERCP procedures is an area of clinical practice where discussion and mutual cooperation between anesthesia and nonanesthesia personnel may enhance patient safety.


2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. AB310
Author(s):  
Shinsuke Kiriyama ◽  
Hiroshi Naito ◽  
Takaharu Fukasawa ◽  
Kana Saito ◽  
Yuichi Tabe ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 142 (5) ◽  
pp. S-395-S-396
Author(s):  
Rajvinder Singh ◽  
Jonathon Foenander ◽  
Sandeep S. Sethi ◽  
Angela Ashby ◽  
Sharon Drummond ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document