1969 ◽  
Vol 67 (2, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 177-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Lore ◽  
Doris Sawatski
Keyword(s):  

1973 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 919-925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry Warnberg ◽  
John W. Somervill

19 crawling infants were presented on the visual cliff. Subsequently, a preference for a smaller checked pattern was successfully established for 10 infants in a non-depth situation where both patterns were placed directly beneath the glass. Although no infants descended to the deep side when patterned surfaces were displayed in the pretest, 5 of 10 infants who reached criterion for the shaping procedure descended to the deep side and 5 to the shallow in a posttest. Under nonpatterned conditions, a consistent preference for shallow or deep sides was not evidenced in either pretest or posttest conditions.


1980 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Rader ◽  
Mary Bausano ◽  
John E. Richards

Infancy ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Witherington ◽  
Joseph J. Campos ◽  
David I. Anderson ◽  
Laure Lejeune ◽  
Eileen Seah
Keyword(s):  

Science ◽  
1957 ◽  
Vol 126 (3263) ◽  
pp. 80-81
Author(s):  
R. D. Walk ◽  
E. J. Gibson ◽  
T. J. Tighe
Keyword(s):  

1964 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 423-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doris C. Dehardt ◽  
David L. Whitney

On an open visual cliff rats significantly preferred the shallow side while on an otherwise comparable closed cliff they did not, suggesting either that depth discrimination is enhanced by the additional information provided by the deep side of the open model, or that animals merely avoided the large open area of the deep side. The latter suggests that side preferences in open model cliffs are not necessarily valid indicators of visual depth discriminability in rats. Texture density was not a sufficient cue for depth discriminability as indicated by the preference of Ss for 1-in. checks in both 3-in. vs 1-in. and 1-in. vs ¼-in. comparison tests.


1972 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 301-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon G. Gallup ◽  
George T. Williamson

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adi Tzameret ◽  
Ifat Sher ◽  
Victoria Edelstain ◽  
Michael Belkin ◽  
Ofra Kalter-Leibovici ◽  
...  

AbstractPreserving of vision is the main goal in vision research. The presented research evaluates the preservation of visual function in Royal College of Surgeon (RCS) rats using a depth perception test. Rats were placed on a stage with one side containing an illusory steep drop (“cliff”) and another side with a minimal drop (“table”). Latency of stage dismounting and the percentage of rats that set their first foot on the “cliff” side were determined. Nondystrophic Long–Evans (LE) rats were tested as control. Electroretinogram and histology analysis were used to determine retinal function and structure. Four-week-old RCS rats presented a significantly shorter mean latency to dismount the stage compared with 6-week-old rats (mean ± standard error, 13.7 ± 1.68 vs. 20.85 ± 6.5 s, P = 0.018). Longer latencies were recorded as rats aged, reaching 45.72 s in 15-week-old rats (P < 0.00001 compared with 4-week-old rats). All rats at the age of 4 weeks placed their first foot on the table side. By contrast, at the age of 8 weeks, 28.6% rats dismounted on the cliff side and at the age of 10 and 15 weeks, rats randomly dismounted the stage to either table or cliff side. LE rats dismounted the stage faster than 4-week-old RCS rats, but the difference was not statistically significant (7 ± 1.58 s, P = 0.057) and all LE rats dismounted on the table side. The latency to dismount the stage in RCS rats correlated with maximal electroretinogram b-wave under dark and light adaptation (Spearman’s rho test = −0.603 and −0.534, respectively, all P < 0.0001), outer nuclear layer thickness (Spearman’s rho test = −0.764, P = 0.002), and number of S- and M-cones (Spearman’s rho test = −0.763 [P = 0.002], and −0.733 [P = 0.004], respectively). The cliff avoidance test is an objective, quick, and readily available method for the determination of RCS rats’ visual function.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document