Merotopic Spaces and Extensions of Closure Spaces

1983 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 613-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. C. Chattopadhyay ◽  
Olav Njåstad ◽  
W. J. Thron

Proximity spaces and contiguity spaces, and more recently nearness spaces, have been studied not just because they provide various approaches to uniform structure. Possibly of greater importance is that they can be used as a means of introducing compactifications and more general extensions of the topological spaces on which they are defined. Riesz [20] was probably the first to recognize this connection. Since then the idea was used by Freudenthal [9], Alexandroff [1], Smirnov [21], Leader [17] and Ivanov and Ivanova [13, 14, 15] among others.Recently Reed [19] using work of Bentley [2, 4] and Herrlich [11, 12] studied the 1 – 1 correspondence between the class of all cluster generated nearness spaces and the class all principal T1-extensions of a given T1-space. She succeeded in showing that the mapping induces a 1 – 1 correspondence between the contingual nearness spaces in and the compactifications in .

2020 ◽  
Vol 1591 ◽  
pp. 012083
Author(s):  
Yiezi Kadham Mahdi Altalkany ◽  
Luay A. A. Al Swidi

1971 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 417-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
William F. Lindgren

Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1274
Author(s):  
Irina Perfilieva ◽  
Ahmed A. Ramadan ◽  
Enas H. Elkordy

Recently, fuzzy systems have become one of the hottest topics due to their applications in the area of computer science. Therefore, in this article, we are making efforts to add new useful relationships between the selected L-fuzzy (fuzzifying) systems. In particular, we establish relationships between L-fuzzy (fuzzifying) Čech closure spaces, L-fuzzy (fuzzifying) co-topological spaces and L-fuzzy (fuzzifying) approximation spaces based on reflexive L-fuzzy relations. We also show that there is a Galois correspondence between the categories of these spaces.


Author(s):  
Yiezi Kadham Mahdi AL Talkany, Et. al.

another form  of -operator defined in this paper by using employing two pillars they are i-topological spaces and the proximity spaces


1970 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 206-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Barnhill ◽  
P. Fletcher

1991 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 240-248
Author(s):  
E. Lowen-Colebunders ◽  
Z. G. Szabo

AbstractWe consider two generalizations R0w and R0 of the usual symmetry axiom for topological spaces to arbitrary closure spaces and convergence spaces. It is known that the two properties coincide on Top and define a non-simple subcategory. We show that R0W defines a simple subcategory of closure spaces and R0 a non-simple one. The last negative result follows from the stronger statement that every epireflective subcategory of R0 Conv containing all T1 regular topological spaces is not simple. Similar theorems are shown for the topological categories Fil and Mer.


1977 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1277-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. C. Chattopadhyay ◽  
W. J. Thron

Extension theory has been intensively studied for completely regular spaces and is fairly well developed for T0-topological spaces. (See, for example, [1] and [5]). However, except for definitions of some of the basic concepts in [4] and results on embedding of closure spaces in cubes in [2] and [7], ours is the first study of the general theory of extensions of G0-closure spaces. (Definitions will be given following these introductory paragraphs).


Author(s):  
Yiezi Kadham Mahdi AL Talkany, Et. al.

A new kind of some topological spaces concepts has been defined in i-topological spaces with respect to proximity spaces in our paper.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document