scholarly journals 10. Increasing Capital Income Share and Its Effect on Personal Income Inequality

After Piketty ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. 235-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diogo Correia ◽  
Ricardo Barradas

The aim of this paper is to conduct a time series econometric analysis in order to empirically evaluate the role of financialisation in the slowdown of labour productivity in Portugal during the period from 1980 to 2017. During that time, the Portuguese economy faced a financialisation phenomenon due to the European integration process and the corresponding imposition of a strong wave of privatisation, liberalisation and deregulation of the Portuguese financial system. At the same time, Portuguese labour productivity exhibited a sustained downward trend, which seems to contradict the well-entrenched mainstream hypothesis on the finance–productivity nexus. Based on the post-Keynesian literature, we identify four channels through which the phenomenon of financialisation has impaired labour productivity, namely weak economic performance, the fall in labour’s share of income, the rise of inequality in personal income and an intensification of the degree of financialisation. The paper finds that lagged labour productivity, economic performance and labour income share positively impact labour productivity in Portugal, while personal income inequality and the degree of financialisation negatively impact labour productivity in Portugal. The paper also finds that the main triggers for the slowdown of labour productivity in Portugal are the degree of financialisation and personal income inequality over the last decades.


2022 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. 105783
Author(s):  
Gabriel Burdín ◽  
Mauricio De Rosa ◽  
Andrea Vigorito ◽  
Joan Vilá
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Marcin T. Kacperczyk ◽  
Jaromir B. Nosal ◽  
Luminita Stevens

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
Songtao Wang ◽  
Tristan Kenderdine ◽  
Zhen Qi

This paper demystifies variation in labor’s share of national labor income in China from the perspective of the income gap. We extend the gross national labor income function by introducing a Gini coefficient to support our argument that the share of gross national labor income decreases with an increasing Gini coefficient. The hypotheses are tested using provincial data from 1996 to 2010: (1) the Gini coefficient’s ‘inverted U’ shape partially contributes to the U-shaped evolution of the labor income-share; (2) China’s 15 per cent decline in the labor income share can be explained by the widening income gap during that time. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document