scholarly journals Hemodynamic and Humoral Response to Intubation with Double-lumen Endotracheal Tubes Versus Single-lumen Tubes Combined with an Endobronchial Blocker: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Nabecker
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Humoral Response ◽  
Double Lumen ◽  
Endotracheal Tubes ◽  
Single Lumen ◽  
Endobronchial Blocker

scholarly journals Heparin solution in the prevention of occlusions in Hickman® catheters a randomized clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Regina da Silva ◽  
Mitzy Tannia Reichembach ◽  
Letícia Pontes ◽  
Gisele de Paula e Silva Carneiro Mendes de Souza ◽  
Solena Kusma
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Isotonic Saline ◽  
Saline Group ◽  
Double Lumen ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Heparin Group ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Heparin Solution ◽  
The Mean

Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of the 50 IU/mL heparin solution compared to the 0.9% isotonic saline solution in preventing occlusion of the double lumen Hickman® catheter, 7 and 9 French, in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Method: a triple-blind randomized clinical trial. 17 double-lumen catheters (heparin group: n=7 and 0.9% isotonic saline group: n=10) were analyzed in which the two catheter routes were evaluated separately, totaling 34 lumens. The outcome variables were occlusion without reflux and complete occlusion. Descriptive analyses were performed using the Chi-square test and, of survival, according to the Kaplan-Meier test. Results: the mean number of days until the occlusion outcome was 52 in the heparin group and 13.46 in the 0.9% isotonic saline group in the white catheter route (p<0.001). In the red route, the mean follow-up days in the heparin group were 35.29, with no occlusion and 22.30 in the 0.9% isotonic saline group until the first occlusion (p=0.030). Conclusion: blocking with 50 IU/mL heparin solution is more effective than 0.9% isotonic saline in preventing occlusion of the Hickman® catheter. Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials: RBR-3ht499.

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Double-Lumen Tube and EZ-Blocker for Single-Lung Ventilation

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 161-162
Author(s):  
K. Ruetzler ◽  
G. Grubhofer ◽  
W. Schmid ◽  
D. Papp ◽  
S. Nabecker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Lung Ventilation ◽  
Double Lumen Tube ◽  
Double Lumen ◽  
Lumen Tube ◽  
Single Lung Ventilation

Exchanging double-lumen for single-lumen endotracheal tubes after thoracotomy

1991 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 323-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie W. Rusch ◽  
Peter R. Freund ◽  
T.Andrew Bowdle
Keyword(s):  
Double Lumen ◽  
Endotracheal Tubes ◽  
Single Lumen

scholarly journals Randomized clinical trial comparing double-lumen tube and EZ-Blocker ® for single-lung ventilation

2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (6) ◽  
pp. 896-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Ruetzler ◽  
G. Grubhofer ◽  
W. Schmid ◽  
D. Papp ◽  
S. Nabecker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Lung Ventilation ◽  
Double Lumen Tube ◽  
Double Lumen ◽  
Lumen Tube ◽  
Single Lung Ventilation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document