scholarly journals Double Intervention in Single Sitting: Percutaneous Device Closure and Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in a Patient with Atrial Septal Defect

2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (20) ◽  
pp. 1311-1315
Author(s):  
Raghu Cherukupalli ◽  
Shawkat Miro ◽  
Srinivas Movva ◽  
Prashant Patil ◽  
Nirlep Gajiwala ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-291
Author(s):  
Natraj Setty H.S. ◽  
M.C. Yeriswamy ◽  
Veeresh Patil ◽  
Jayashree Kharge ◽  
T.R. Raghu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 755-760
Author(s):  
Shu-Ting Huang ◽  
Kai-Peng Sun ◽  
Ning Xu ◽  
Qiang Chen ◽  
Hua Cao

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 343-346
Author(s):  
Shyam Kumar Singh Thingnam ◽  
Sachin Mahajan ◽  
Vikas Kumar

Background Percutaneous device closure of an ostium secundum atrial septal defect is associated with excellent outcomes and cosmetic results but at the cost of occasional serious and sometimes fatal complications as well as lifelong follow-up. Surgical intervention is required in cases of device-related complications, which carries a slightly higher risk compared to primary closure of an atrial septal defect. We present a surgical perspective of device closure of atrial septal defect. Methods Our database was searched over 4 years for complications related to percutaneous device closure of atrial septal defect, which required surgical retrieval of the device and closure of the defect. We identified 14 cases that required surgical intervention. Results The median age of the 14 patients was 18 years (range 4–58 years). The size of the defect ranged from 15 to 40 mm (median 30 mm). Device embolization into any part of the cardiovascular system ( n = 8) was the most common complication, followed by malalignment of the device ( n = 5). One patient had left atrial appendage perforation causing pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade, and underwent surgical repair. The other 13 patients underwent removal of the device and atrial septal defect closure. One patient developed severe mitral regurgitation requiring mitral valve replacement. There was no mortality. Conclusion Although the incidence of device-related complications may be small, they carry a high risk of death or long-term morbidity, even with a small atrial septal defect, unlike primary surgical closure of isolated atrial septal defect.


2013 ◽  
Vol 167 (4) ◽  
pp. 1578-1584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Monfredi ◽  
Matthew Luckie ◽  
Hoda Mirjafari ◽  
Terence Willard ◽  
Helen Buckley ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 797-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nefthi Sandeep ◽  
Michael C. Slack

AbstractCoronary sinus atrial septal defects are the rarest defects of the atrial septum comprising <1% of the five different types of atrial septal defects. Despite the widespread adoption of percutaneous device closure of secundum atrial septal defects, the published experience with percutaneous device closure of coronary sinus atrial septal defects is limited to only a few isolated case reports because of uncertainty regarding safety and efficacy. Open-heart surgical repair remains the treatment of choice for coronary sinus atrial septal defects, although this may not be the only treatment option in selected cases. Herein we describe our own experience with two patients with different clinical presentations and our method of successful percutaneous coronary sinus atrial septal defect closure in each. We then present a review of the anatomic spectrum of coronary sinus atrial septal defects along with a review of contemporary surgical and percutaneous device treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document