Novel approaches to guide complete revascularisation in patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (18) ◽  
pp. e1558-e1559
Author(s):  
Zardasht Oqab ◽  
Elie Akl ◽  
Shamir R. Mehta
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (01) ◽  
pp. 45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo De Innocentiis ◽  
Marco Zimarino ◽  
Raffaele De Caterina ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

In multivessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD), myocardial revascularisation can be achieved by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), with complete revascularisation on all diseased coronary segments or with incomplete revascularisation on selectively targeted lesions. Complete revascularisation confers a long-term prognostic benefit, but is associated with a higher rate of periprocedural events compared with incomplete revascularisation. In most patients with MVCAD, the main advantage of CABG over PCI is conferred by the achievement of more extensive revascularisation. According to current international guidelines, PCI is generally preferred in single-vessel disease, low-risk MVCAD or isolated left main disease; whereas CABG is usually recommended in patients with complex two-vessel disease, most patients with three-vessel disease and/or non-isolated left main disease. In patients with MVCAD, the choice on revascularisation modality should depend on a multifactorial evaluation, taking into account not only coronary anatomy, the ischaemic burden, myocardial function, age and the presence of comorbidities, but also the adequacy of myocardial revascularisation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Mahdi ◽  
B Har ◽  
M.M Graham ◽  
A Basha ◽  
A Bizios

Abstract Background In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD), complete revascularisation is associated with reduced mortality compared to culprit only revascularisation. However, there are limited data regarding the relationship between sex and revascularisation strategy in STEMI with multivessel CAD and outcomes. Purpose Our aim is to evaluate sex related differences in treatment strategies and outcomes in patients with STEMI and multi-vessel CAD. Methods We included all consecutive patients from a provincial registry presenting with STEMI and multivessel CAD treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 2008–2015. The study population consisted of 856 females and 3152 males who were treated with culprit vessel only PCI or complete revascularisation using staged-PCI. The outcomes were death, admission for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and admission for heart failure (HF). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the association between treatment strategy and outcomes. Backward stepwise logistic regression was used to identify predictors of patients undergoing staged-PCI versus culprit vessel only PCI. Results At 3 years, the incidence of death was higher in females than males (15.9% vs. 8.2%, p<0.001), as were HF admissions (10.3% vs. 5.0%, p<0.001). Females underwent less staged-PCI than males (10.4% vs. 14.8%; adjusted odds ratio 0.75; 95% CI 0.57–0.97). Younger age and increasing Duke jeopardy score were also associated with performing staged-PCI. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, females had a higher risk of death (HR 1.35; 95% CI 1.07–1.71), ACS admission (HR 1.27; 95% CI 1.00–1.60), and HF admission (HR 1.38; 95% CI 1.03–1.85). Following additional adjustment for revascularisation strategy, only death and HF admission remained significant. Females undergoing staged-PCI had similar survival to males (figure), with no significant interaction between revascularisation strategy and sex (p for interaction = 0.19) Conclusion Females with STEMI and multivessel CAD were less likely to be treated with complete revascularisation by staged-PCI and had worse outcomes when compared to males. Survival in both males and females treated with staged-PCI was similar. Our study suggests that addressing the lack of complete revascularisation in females presenting with STEMI may improve outcomes. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Circulation ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 102 (Supplement 3) ◽  
pp. III-79-III-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Wendler ◽  
B. Hennen ◽  
S. Demertzis ◽  
T. Markwirth ◽  
D. Tscholl ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 92 (10) ◽  
pp. 2831-2840 ◽  
Author(s):  
William S. Weintraub ◽  
Patrick D. Mauldin ◽  
Edmund Becker ◽  
Andrzej S. Kosinski ◽  
Spencer B. King

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document