scholarly journals Ethical dilemma of colorectal screening: What age should a screening colonoscopy start and stop?

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 461-464
Author(s):  
Alla Turshudzhyan ◽  
Alexa Trovato ◽  
Micheal Tadros
2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 578-578
Author(s):  
Eduardo Negrete Carballo ◽  
Fidel David Huitzil Melendez

578 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the world. There is strong evidence that screening for colorectal cancer improves survival in conutries with high incidence. Although Mexico is considered a country with a low incidence of CRC, 4694 potentially preventable deaths occur every year. There is no established CRC screening program in our country, risk stratification of the target populations to be screened may bring potential advantages, making the strategy more cost-effective. The Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening (APCS) score, is a validated risk-stratification tool that helps identify individuals at risk for advanced colorectal neoplasm amongst the asymptomatic population. Methods: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of database records from 1172 patients who underwent screening colonoscopy betwen january 2013 and november 2014. Results: The prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia was 2.9%. Applying the APCS stratification, 91 subjects (7.8%) were in the average risk tier, 849 subjects (72.4%) in the moderate risk tier and 232 (19.8%) subjects in the high risk tier. The prevalence of advanced neoplasia in the average risk, moderate risk and high risk groups was 0%, 2.6% and 5.1%, respectively. The subjects in the high risk tier had 2.21-fold (p = 0.021) increased prevalence of advanced neoplasia than those in the average-moderate tier. Conclusions: The APCS score is a simple risk stratification index for colorectal advanced neoplasm that uses elementary clinical information on age, gender, family history and smoking to stratify the risk of colorectal advanced neoplasm in asymptomatic subjects for priority of colorectal screening.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A405-A405
Author(s):  
T IMPERIALE ◽  
D WAGNER ◽  
C LIN ◽  
G LARKIN ◽  
J ROGGE ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 158 (42) ◽  
pp. 1658-1667
Author(s):  
Mariann Rutka ◽  
Tamás Molnár ◽  
Renáta Bor ◽  
Klaudia Farkas ◽  
Anna Fábián ◽  
...  

Abstract: Introduction: In Hungary, a nationwide colorectal screening program is about to be introduced in order to improve the extremely high mortality rate of colorectal cancer (CRC). Aim: The aim of our study was to summarize experiences and assess short-term efficacy of the population-based pilot colorectal screening program in 2015 in Csongrád County, Hungary. Patients and method: Asymptomatic individuals between the ages of 50 and 70 with average risk of colorectal cancer participated in the program that was based on the two-step screening method (i.e. immune fecal blood test and colonoscopy). The short-term efficacy of the screening program was assessed as the change in total CRC incidence and initial tumor stage in the screening year (2015) compared to a control year (2013) in Szeged and its surroundings. Participation rate, positive predictive value of the screening methods and tumor detection rate was assessed. Results: 22,130 individuals were invited, the participation rate was 46.4%. Immune fecal blood test proved to be non-negative in 1,343 cases (13%), screening colonoscopy was performed in 766 of them (7.5%). Total colonoscopy was performed in 711 individuals. Based on the reports, adenoma was detected in 358 (50.3%) and malignancy in 42 (5.9%) individuals. In the background population, the incidence of colon cancer was significantly higher (183 vs. 228; p = 0.026) and was diagnosed at significantly earlier stage (p = 0.002). Lymph node involvement was significantly lower in 2015 (48.3% vs. 37.1%; p = 0.049). Conclusion: The Csongrád county population-based colorectal cancer screening was evidently successful on the short term considering participation rate, and the changes in CRC incidence and stage, thus its national extension is necessary. Orv Hetil. 2017; 158(42): 1658–1667.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A405
Author(s):  
Thomas F. Imperiale ◽  
David R. Wagner ◽  
Ching Y. Lin ◽  
Gregory N. Larkin ◽  
James D. Rogge ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L. Werth ◽  
Joshua Bradley ◽  
Rebecca S. Allen ◽  
Dean Blevins
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document