scholarly journals Catathrenia; Sleep-related Respiratory Disorder Which May Mimic Central Sleep Apnea in Polysomnography: A Case Report

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-43
Author(s):  
Sevgi Ferik ◽  
İbrahim Öztura ◽  
Barış Baklan
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshihiko Mori ◽  
Eri Nishino ◽  
Tomomi Jitsukawa ◽  
Emiko Hoshino ◽  
Satoshi Hirakawa ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sina Akbarian ◽  
Nasim Montazeri Ghahjaverestan ◽  
Azadeh Yadollahi ◽  
Babak Taati

BACKGROUND Sleep apnea is a respiratory disorder characterized by an intermittent reduction (hypopnea) or cessation (apnea) of breathing during sleep. Depending on the presence of a breathing effort, sleep apnea is divided into obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and central sleep apnea (CSA) based on the different pathologies involved. If the majority of apneas in a person are obstructive, they will be diagnosed as OSA or otherwise as CSA. In addition, as it is challenging and highly controversial to divide hypopneas into central or obstructive, the decision about sleep apnea type (OSA vs CSA) is made based on apneas only. Choosing the appropriate treatment relies on distinguishing between obstructive apnea (OA) and central apnea (CA). OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to develop a noncontact method to distinguish between OAs and CAs. METHODS Five different computer vision-based algorithms were used to process infrared (IR) video data to track and analyze body movements to differentiate different types of apnea (OA vs CA). In the first two methods, supervised classifiers were trained to process optical flow information. In the remaining three methods, a convolutional neural network (CNN) was designed to extract distinctive features from optical flow and to distinguish OA from CA. RESULTS Overnight sleeping data of 42 participants (mean age 53, SD 15 years; mean BMI 30, SD 7 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; 27 men and 15 women; mean number of OA 16, SD 30; mean number of CA 3, SD 7; mean apnea-hypopnea index 27, SD 31 events/hour; mean sleep duration 5 hours, SD 1 hour) were collected for this study. The test and train data were recorded in two separate laboratory rooms. The best-performing model (3D-CNN) obtained 95% accuracy and an <i>F</i><sub>1</sub> score of 89% in differentiating OA vs CA. CONCLUSIONS In this study, the first vision-based method was developed that differentiates apnea types (OA vs CA). The developed algorithm tracks and analyses chest and abdominal movements captured via an IR video camera. Unlike previously developed approaches, this method does not require any attachment to a user that could potentially alter the sleeping condition.


Respiration ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 90 (6) ◽  
pp. 507-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lampros Perogamvros ◽  
Jean Louis Pépin ◽  
Gabriel Thorens ◽  
Pierre Mégevand ◽  
Elisabeth Claudel ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (08) ◽  
pp. 1179-1182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Paboeuf ◽  
Pascaline Priou ◽  
Nicole Meslier ◽  
Frédéric Roulaud ◽  
Wojciech Trzepizur ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. e13254
Author(s):  
Noah P. Jouett ◽  
Michael L. Smith ◽  
Donald E. Watenpaugh ◽  
Maryam Siddiqui ◽  
Maleeha Ahmad ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-70
Author(s):  
Nicoleta Aurelia POPESCU ◽  
Marcela Daniela IONESCU ◽  
Georgiana BALAN ◽  
Simina VISAN ◽  
Eliza CINTEZA ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document