Health care work and patient care information systems

2003 ◽  
pp. 57-75
2003 ◽  
Vol 42 (04) ◽  
pp. 337-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Berg

Summary Objectives: This article aims to search for the way patient care information systems can be most fruitfully put to work in health care. Methods: Given the calls for improved health care quality, there is a need for IT’s coordination capacities in health care. Yet IT’s track record in this area is less than many expected. Moreover, many argue that the nature of health care work sets natural limits to the possibilities of IT to revolutionize this work. Starting with an analysis of the paper record, this article explores the way IT and professional work can be interrelated synergistically. Results: Two principles are discussed: 1) The key to a fruitful operation of IT in health care work lies in the unraveling of the care process, and the redistribution of tasks between professionals and the IT application. 2) Professionals should be given the skills and resources to adapt the IT application’s demands to the needs of their work practices. Conclusion: IT can bring true process support to health care when taking the two principles discussed here into account.


1992 ◽  
Vol 31 (03) ◽  
pp. 204-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Timpka ◽  
J. M. Nyce

Abstract:For the development of computer-supported cooperative health care work this study investigated, based upon activity theory, daily dilemmas encountered by the members of interprofessional primary health care work groups. The entire staff at four Swedish primary health care centers were surveyed, 199 personal interviews being conducted by the Critical Incident Technique. Medical dilemmas were mainly reported by general practitioners and nurses, organizational dilemmas by laboratory staff, nurses’ aides, and secretaries, and dilemmas in the patient-provider relation by nurses, nurses’ aides, and secretaries. Organizational and communication dilemmas reported by nurses, nurses’ aides, and secretaries often had their cause outside the control of the individual professional. These dilemmas were often “caused” by other group members (general practitioners or nurses), e.g., by not keeping appointment times or by not sharing information with patients. The implication for computer-supported cooperative health care work is that computer support should be planned on two levels. Collective work activity as a whole should benefit from individual clinical decision support for general practitioners and nurses. However, since most patient communication and organizational problems occurred at group level, group process support is required in these areas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document