Adherence to sport injury rehabilitation

Author(s):  
Britton W. Brewer
Physiotherapy ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory S. Kolt ◽  
Britton W. Brewer ◽  
Tania Pizzari ◽  
Adrian M.M. Schoo ◽  
Nick Garrett

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Damien Clement ◽  
Monna Arvinen-Barrow

Context: A multidisciplinary approach is one of the many forms of professional practice that can be utilized by sports medicine professionals to provide care to injured athletes. While this approach has been empirically supported in the health care domain, studies supporting its utilization in the sport injury rehabilitation context—particularly at the high school level—are limited. Objective: To investigate former high school athletes’ experiences of a multidisciplinary model of care for sport injury rehabilitation. Design: Cross-sectional survey design. Setting: In-person, in a classroom setting at 2 Division I universities. Patients: A total of 186 former high school athletes. Main Outcome Measure: An author-constructed instrument developed using the multidisciplinary model of care for sport injury rehabilitation as a guide. Results: Family, athletic coaches, and athletic trainers were the closest professionals/individuals that injured athletes reported interacting with during sport injury rehabilitation. The data also revealed that these professionals/individuals had the closest and most direct relationships with the injured athletes. Conclusions: The findings from the present study provided support for the utilization of the multidisciplinary model of care for sport injury rehabilitation with high school athletes.


2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R. Levy ◽  
Remco C. J. Polman ◽  
Adam R. Nicholls ◽  
David C. Marchant

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew P. Bejar ◽  
Johannes Raabe ◽  
Rebecca A. Zakrajsek ◽  
Leslee A. Fisher ◽  
Damien Clement

Context Athletic trainers (ATs) have indicated a desire to better understand the motivations of athletes during rehabilitation. Self-determination theory offers an ideal lens for conceptualizing the antecedents, mediators, and consequences of motivated behavior. Objective To explore athletes' perceptions of ATs' influence on their basic psychological needs as well as their motivation during sport injury rehabilitation. Design Qualitative study. Setting National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I universities in the northwestern and southeastern United States. Patients or Other Participants A total of 10 injured and previously injured athletes (7 women, 3 men; mean age = 20.9 ± 2.0 years) active in a variety of sports. Data Collection and Analysis Participants completed semistructured interviews, which were transcribed verbatim. The data were analyzed using consensual qualitative research methods. Trustworthiness techniques (eg, bracketing interview, discussion of biases, member checking, external auditor) were used throughout the process. Results Four domains were constructed: (a) athletes' concerns about injury and rehabilitation, (b) ATs' feedback and athletes' perceptions of competence, (c) a person-centered approach from ATs and athletes' perceptions of autonomy, and (d) a connection between ATs' and athletes' perceptions of relatedness. Athletes' experiences were largely influenced by the degree to which they perceived that ATs satisfied their 3 basic psychological needs, which, in turn, was determined by the presence or absence of particular AT behaviors, such as providing encouragement (competence), soliciting input (autonomy), and building rapport (relatedness). Furthermore, the degree to which they perceived these basic psychological needs were fulfilled (or thwarted) affected their overall motivation during sport injury rehabilitation. Conclusions Self-determination theory is a promising framework for ATs to consider when addressing motivational challenges among injured athletes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document