A history of residential child care

Author(s):  
Nick Frost ◽  
Sue Mills ◽  
Mike Stein
2000 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-216
Author(s):  
Leslie B. Whitbeck

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Smith ◽  
Leon Fulcher ◽  
Peter Doran

2021 ◽  
pp. 147332502199087
Author(s):  
Lisa Warwick

This article theorises adult-child touch in residential child care as a relational practice, contributing to an emergent literature on residential child care, and conceptualises residential child care as a Lifespace. It responds to an on-going debate surrounding the use of touch in the sector, which has attracted academic attention since the early 1990s as a result of abuse scandals, the ensuing ‘no touch’ policies and a growing body of research identifying touch as an important aspect of child development. The paper draws upon a six-month ethnographic study of residential child care, which was explicitly designed to observe everyday interactions between residential care workers and young people. The findings suggest that touch cannot be discussed in isolation from either relationships or a contextual understanding of relationships in the specific context of residential child care. The study found that touch is unavoidable, relational and that dichotomous understandings of touch continue to present issues for both theory and practice.


2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Steckley ◽  
Mark Smith

Childhood ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 090756822110001
Author(s):  
Lorraine Green ◽  
Lisa Warwick ◽  
Lisa Moran

Touch and silence are neglected across most disciplines, including within child-specific academic literature, and their interconnections have not been studied before. This article focuses on touch/silence convergences in residential childcare in England, drawing from two qualitative studies. We reveal the fluidity, multidimensionality and intersectionality of touch and silence, illuminating the labyrinthine ways they frequently coalesce in children’s homes, often assuming ambiguous forms and meanings. We therefore offer new understandings of these concepts, as multifaceted, entwined, temporal and malleable.


2012 ◽  
Vol 114 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Barbara Beatty ◽  
Edward Zigler

In this article, Edward Zigler, interviewed by Barbara Beatty, talks about a turning point in the history of Head Start that reveals how policy choices, bureaucracy, and science came together when he was told to phase out the program in 1970. New to Washington, Zigler learned that President Richard M. Nixon's domestic policy advisor Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who had put forth the Family Assistance Plan, favored direct support for mothers and families over compensatory preschool education. Zigler saw how both the methodologically flawed 1969 Westinghouse study on the supposed fadeout of Head Start gains and Arthur Jensen's controversial 1969 article on the supposed failure of compensatory education became politicized and influenced arguments about Head Start's future. With President Nixon's veto of the 1971 Child Development Act, Zigler witnessed how competing policies, bureaucracies, and political ideologies could block support for universal child care and comprehensive services for children and families. After many years of consulting to Head Start and research on applied child development, he sees public schools as sites for coordination of social welfare programs that can improve access to high-quality health care, education, child care, and family services, as in his Schools for the 21st Century model.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document